Wärtsilä Marine

Wärtsilä Marine was a Finnish shipbuilding company created in 1987 through the consolidation of the shipbuilding operations of Wärtsilä and Valmet. Its yards were principally located in Helsinki and Turku, including the Perno yard. The merger was intended to improve productivity, eliminate overlapping capacity, and give Finland a stronger response to the severe structural crisis affecting European shipbuilding. The company was established against a difficult economic and industrial background. During the 1970s and 1980s, European yards faced excess capacity, rising labour costs, intense price competition, and the rapid expansion of lower-cost Asian shipbuilders. Finnish yards had been supported by a relatively strong flow of orders from the Soviet Union under bilateral trade arrangements, but the Soviet five-year plan for 1986–1990 brought sharply lower volumes and less favourable prices. Finnish authorities attempted to preserve employment and industrial capacity, including through credit-supported deliveries to the Soviet Union. These conditions made the combination of Wärtsilä’s and Valmet’s shipbuilding businesses politically and industrially attractive, even though the merged company inherited substantial commercial risks. Wärtsilä held 70% of the new shipbuilding company and Valmet 30%. As part of the wider reorganisation, Wärtsilä’s diesel-engine activities were separated into Wärtsilä Diesel, while Wärtsilä’s paper-machine business was transferred to Valmet as part of the transaction. The new company began operating at the start of 1987 under the Finnish name Wärtsilä Meriteollisuus Oy and the Swedish name Wärtsilä Marinindustri Ab. Pekka Laine became its manager. At first, Wärtsilä Marine appeared to have a promising order book. It continued Soviet-related projects inherited from Valmet and won several large passenger-ship contracts, including orders associated with Carnival Cruise Lines, Kloster Cruise, Rederi Ab Slite, and Effoa. The contracts covered cruise ships and cruise ferries intended for international routes, including services between Finland and Sweden. These orders demonstrated the company’s strong reputation in technically demanding passenger-ship construction, but they also placed heavy pressure on its limited financial and production resources. The company’s weaknesses soon became apparent. Much of its capital was tied up in property and equipment rather than cash. Calculations for inherited Soviet projects underestimated the costs, while the construction costs of some cruise ships were also miscalculated. Earlier workforce reductions left the yards short of skilled labour, forcing the company to rely extensively on expensive subcontractors. Labour disputes, including strikes at the Perno yard, further complicated production. The conversion of the vessel Monterey into a cruise ship generated additional losses. Wärtsilä Marine reported a loss of FIM 205 million in 1987 and approximately FIM 638 million in 1988. During 1988, Pekka Laine moved to the parent company and Kari Airaksinen became manager of Wärtsilä Marine. By 1989, estimated losses had grown to roughly FIM 1 billion or more. A rescue plan announced in August 1989 transferred 51% of the company to Yhdyspankki, Oy Pomi Trading, and Wärtsilä-related pension entities for a nominal total consideration of four Finnish markka. Wärtsilä Corporation’s ownership fell below 19%. The rescue was unsuccessful. With cash exhausted and the company reportedly dependent on weekly bills of exchange worth about FIM 60 million, the board placed Wärtsilä Marine into immediate bankruptcy on 23 October 1989. The collapse became one of Finland’s most prominent industrial bankruptcies and was widely associated with the failure of the company’s financing, cost estimates, inherited Soviet commitments, and large passenger-ship programme. The shipyards did not disappear. Martin Saarikangas, who had led the Helsinki yard and was recalled from the United States duri…

Wärtsilä Marine was created during a major restructuring of Finnish shipbuilding. In the 1970s and 1980s, European yards struggled with excess capacity, escalating wage costs, price competition, and competition from rapidly expanding Asian shipbuilders. Finland’s shipbuilding industry had been partially protected by bilateral trade with the Soviet Union, but the Soviet five-year plan covering 1986–1990 reduced both the number and profitability of new orders. Finnish authorities sought to preserve employment and production capacity by supporting deliveries to the Soviet Union through credit arrangements. In 1986, Wärtsilä and Valmet agreed to combine their shipbuilding businesses. The reorganisation was designed to increase productivity and close less competitive facilities, including Valmet yards. Wärtsilä separated its diesel-engine activities into Wärtsilä Diesel Oy, while its paper-machine operations were transferred to Valmet as part of the ownership arrangement. Wärtsilä retained 70% of the new shipbuilding company and Valmet 30%. The company began operations in early 1987 under the Finnish name Wärtsilä Meriteollisuus Oy and used Wärtsilä Marine internationally. Pekka Laine was appointed manager. The new company inherited Soviet-related projects from Valmet and quickly pursued new western orders. It moved part of a nine-ship Soviet project to the Perno yard and secured contracts for large cruise ships and cruise ferries. Customers included Carnival Cruise Lines, Kloster Cruise, Rederi Ab Slite, and Effoa. The volume and complexity of the new work created an apparently strong order book, but the financial and operational foundations of the business were weak. Most of the company’s capital was tied up in fixed assets, leaving relatively little cash for working capital. Cost estimates for inherited Soviet projects were found to be substantially deficient, with the projects expected to generate large losses. Cruise-ship construction also proved more expensive than planned. The company had reduced its workforce before and during the merger, so it had to use subcontractors at high cost. Labour shortages contributed to industrial action, particularly at Perno. Additional losses came from a project to convert the former freight ship Monterey into a cruise vessel. Wärtsilä Marine lost FIM 205 million in 1987. In 1988, after Pekka Laine moved to the parent company, Kari Airaksinen became manager. The company’s loss for that year reached approximately FIM 638 million. By early 1989, the losses were estimated at around FIM 1 billion or more. The parent company’s management attempted to reorganise the business, and Martin Saarikangas was recalled from the United States to lead an urgent recovery effort at the Helsinki yard. Public reports in August described the company as close to bankruptcy. On 10 August 1989, Wärtsilä Marine, the Finnish state, and two Finnish banks announced a financing arrangement intended to complete unfinished projects. A 51% shareholding was transferred to Yhdyspankki, Oy Pomi Trading, and Wärtsilä-related pension funds and foundations for a nominal total price of four Finnish markka. Wärtsilä Corporation’s stake fell below 19%, but the restructuring did not solve the company’s liquidity and cost problems. On 23 October 1989, after the company’s cash reserve had been exhausted, the board decided to place Wärtsilä Marine into immediate bankruptcy. The collapse caused severe uncertainty among employees, subcontractors, customers, and creditors. Saarikangas immediately sought support from Ted Arison of Carnival Cruise Lines, which had unfinished ships in the yards. Arison travelled to Finland and participated in negotiations that helped establish a continuation structure. Helsinki New Shipyard and Turku New Shipyard were created to complete the unfinished vessels. These operations were brought together under Masa-Yards, a successor company named in reference to Martin Saarikangas. The successor yards retained much of the former company’s workforce and production capability, although the restructuring reduced white-collar employment more sharply than blue-collar employment. Wärtsilä Marine therefore ended as a corporate entity, but its principal shipyards continued to play a role in Finnish cruise-ship and ferry construction.

• 1989

  Emergency ownership and financing plan

  [1]Wärtsilä Marineen.wikipedia.org

  A restructuring plan transferred 51% of Wärtsilä Marine to financial and pension-related entities for a nominal consideration while attempting to finance unfinished ship projects.

• 1989

  Bankruptcy

  [1]Wärtsilä Marineen.wikipedia.org

  Wärtsilä Marine entered immediate bankruptcy on 23 October after its liquidity position became unsustainable.

• 1989

  Shipyards restart under successor companies

  [1]Wärtsilä Marineen.wikipedia.org

  Helsinki New Shipyard and Turku New Shipyard were established and later organised under Masa-Yards to continue shipbuilding and complete unfinished vessels.

• 1988

  Management changes amid escalating losses

  [1]Wärtsilä Marineen.wikipedia.org

  Pekka Laine moved to Wärtsilä Corporation and Kari Airaksinen became manager as the company’s loss for the year rose to approximately FIM 638 million.

• 1987

  Wärtsilä Marine begins operations

  [1]Wärtsilä Marineen.wikipedia.org

  The combined shipbuilding company started operating in Helsinki and Turku under the Finnish and Swedish names Wärtsilä Meriteollisuus and Wärtsilä Marinindustri.

• 1987

  Major cruise and ferry orders are secured

  [1]Wärtsilä Marineen.wikipedia.org

  The company won contracts from Carnival Cruise Lines, Kloster Cruise, Rederi Ab Slite, and Effoa for large cruise ships and cruise ferries.

• 1987

  First major operating loss is recorded

  [1]Wärtsilä Marineen.wikipedia.org

  Wärtsilä Marine reported a loss of FIM 205 million in its first operating year.

• 1986

  Wärtsilä and Valmet agree to combine shipbuilding operations

  [1]Wärtsilä Marineen.wikipedia.org

  The two leading Finnish shipbuilders agreed to consolidate their shipbuilding activities and close or reduce less competitive facilities.

A Finnish shipbuilder focused on large, technically demanding passenger vessels and selected Soviet-market projects. Its commercial positioning rested on the strong reputation of the former Wärtsilä yards, but its expansion was undermined by inherited low-margin contracts, cost-estimation errors, capacity constraints, and a deteriorating European shipbuilding market.

• Passenger vessels · 1987

  Large cruise ships

  Wärtsilä Marine pursued large cruise-ship construction for international operators, most notably Carnival Cruise Lines. The vessels required complex design, outfitting, and systems integration, and were central to the company’s attempt to replace declining Soviet-related work with higher-value western orders. Cost-estimation errors on some projects contributed materially to the company’s financial crisis.

• Passenger vessels · 1987

  Cruise ferries

  The company built and contracted cruise ferries for Baltic and Nordic routes, including services linking Finland and Sweden. These vessels combined vehicle and passenger transport with cruise-style accommodation and amenities. Orders from Rederi Ab Slite and Effoa formed part of the rapid expansion of Wärtsilä Marine’s passenger-vessel order book.

• Commercial vessels · 1987

  Soviet-market ships

  Wärtsilä Marine inherited and continued several shipbuilding projects connected with Soviet trade. Some projects had been priced under employment-preservation and bilateral-trade considerations rather than normal commercial profitability. Their underestimation and later subcontracting requirements created significant losses for the new company.

• Ship conversion

  Monterey conversion

  The Monterey project involved converting an older American freight vessel into a cruise ship at the former Wärtsilä Turku yard. The work became an additional source of losses during the company’s short operating life and illustrated the financial exposure associated with complex conversion work.

• 1989

  Wärtsilä Marine bankruptcy

  The company collapsed after losses accumulated from underestimated Soviet projects, incorrectly calculated cruise-ship construction costs, expensive subcontracting, labour problems, and an inadequate liquidity position. The board declared immediate bankruptcy on 23 October 1989.

  Source

• 1987

  Inherited contract and cost-estimation controversy

  Projects inherited from Valmet were later found to carry substantial expected losses, while the costs of major cruise-ship contracts had also been underestimated. The episode became central to public criticism of the merger and the company’s financial controls.

  Source

Read more

• 1989

  Implement an emergency ownership restructuringStrategy

  Background

  The company was approaching insolvency, with losses estimated at approximately FIM 1 billion or more and insufficient support available from its existing owners.

  Action taken

  A 51% stake was transferred to Yhdyspankki, Oy Pomi Trading, and Wärtsilä-related pension entities for a nominal total price of four Finnish markka, alongside a financing plan involving the state and Finnish banks.

  Aftermath

  The plan did not restore liquidity, and Wärtsilä Marine entered bankruptcy later that year.

  Nominal price for 51% shareholding. FIM 4 (10 August 1989)

  Source

• 1989

  Place Wärtsilä Marine into immediate bankruptcyOther

  Background

  The company’s cash reserve was exhausted and it was operating with very large short-term bills of exchange. The board estimated current losses at approximately FIM 1.6 billion.

  Action taken

  The board decided on 23 October 1989 to place the company into immediate bankruptcy.

  Aftermath

  New Helsinki and Turku shipyard companies were formed with customer and creditor support, and the operations were later organised under Masa-Yards.

  Source

• 1987

  Pursue a large western cruise-ship programmeProduct launch

  Background

  The company needed new work as Soviet export demand weakened, while the former Wärtsilä yards retained a strong reputation for passenger-ship construction.

  Action taken

  Wärtsilä Marine accepted major cruise-ship and cruise-ferry contracts from Carnival Cruise Lines and other international operators.

  Aftermath

  The orders enlarged the backlog but exposed the company to major cost overruns and working-capital requirements.

  Source

• 1986

  Combine Wärtsilä and Valmet shipbuildingStrategy

  Background

  Finnish shipbuilding faced excess capacity, foreign competition, declining Soviet orders, and pressure to preserve employment.

  Action taken

  The companies consolidated their shipbuilding operations, assigned 70% of the new company to Wärtsilä and 30% to Valmet, and planned to reduce less competitive capacity.

  Aftermath

  The merger created Wärtsilä Marine but also transferred loss-making projects and structural weaknesses into the new organisation.

  Source

1. 1Wärtsilä Marineen.wikipedia.org