Skip to content

Uber controversies

Controversies tied to this brand in public sources. A listing is not a finding of fault.

Back to profile27 entries · Page 1 of 2

  1. 2026

    Boise woman sues Uber alleging failure to protect her from delivery driver

    Lawsuit filed

    A woman from Boise has filed a lawsuit against Uber, alleging that the company failed to protect her from a delivery driver. The claim centers on the assertion that Uber did not provide adequate protection in connection with the delivery driver. The lawsuit was reported as a news event, with the source describing the filing and the woman's allegation against the company.

    Source excerpt

    • Boise woman sues Uber, saying company failed to protect her from delivery driver
  2. 2026

    Dutch privacy watchdog fines Uber €825M over automated driver suspensions

    Fine or penalty

    The Dutch privacy watchdog fined Uber €825 million (approximately $966 million) for using automated systems to suspend and deactivate drivers in violation of the EU General Data Protection Regulation, finding that drivers were subject to significant decisions based solely on automated processing without sufficient safeguards and were not given sufficient information about how the decisions were made. Uber disputes the findings and plans to appeal.

    Company response

    • Denial — Uber

      Uber disputes the findings and plans to appeal the decision.
    • Denial — Uber

      "We strongly disagree with this decision and disproportionate fine," an Uber spokesperson said
    • Clarification — Uber

      adding that the company takes drivers' rights seriously and its policies include both human reviews and opportunities for drivers to dispute platform suspensions

    Source excerpt

    • The Dutch privacy watchdog has fined Uber €825 million (approximately $966 million) for the way it used automated systems to suspend and deactivate drivers.
    • Uber disputes the findings and plans to appeal the decision.
    • Reuters reported that the decision was reached on Friday, Aug. 21.
  3. 2026

    U.S. Justice Department sues Uber over alleged discrimination against riders with disabilities

    Lawsuit filed

    The U.S. Justice Department filed a $125 million lawsuit against Uber, alleging the ride-sharing company discriminates against passengers with disabilities by refusing service, charging cleaning fees for service animal shedding, and charging cancellation fees to riders unlawfully denied service, in violation of Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act. The lawsuit seeks a court order to stop the discrimination, policy changes, ADA training, monetary damages, and a civil penalty. Uber said it disagrees with the DOJ's allegations and cited its zero-tolerance policy for confirmed service denials.

    Stated objective. This lawsuit seeks to end this persistent discrimination and allow riders with disabilities to use Uber.

    Company response

    • Denial — Uber

      We have a clear zero-tolerance policy for confirmed service denials, and we fundamentally disagree with the DOJ's allegations.
    • Remediation — Uber

      The company says it began waiving the late fees for any rider who 'certifies' they're disabled, though it did not clarify how a passenger would do that.

    Source excerpt

    • The DOJ alleges the company's actions violate Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act, which prohibits discrimination based on a person's disability.
    • Last fall, the Justice Department filed a $125 million lawsuit against Uber, alleging that the ride-sharing company discriminates against passengers with disabilities.
    • We have a clear zero-tolerance policy for confirmed service denials, and we fundamentally disagree with the DOJ's allegations.
  4. 2026

    Uber Wins Bid to Throw Out UK Lawsuits

    Ruling

    Uber said it had won its bid to throw out two linked lawsuits brought by thousands of London black cab drivers and two former private hire companies. The claims alleged that Uber gave misleading and inaccurate information to Transport for London about obtaining a private hire vehicle operating licence. The company announced the outcome of its bid to dismiss the linked claims; the available account does not specify further details of the proceedings or their consequences.

    Source excerpt

    • Uber on Monday ⁠said it had won its ‌bid to throw out two linked lawsuits valued at around £340 million ($453 million) ​brought by thousands ⁠of London black ⁠cab drivers and two former ⁠private hire ‌companies.
    • The ride-hailing app was sued in ⁠2024 over allegations about how it ​obtained ‌a private hire vehicle ⁠operating licence ​in the British capital, with the claimants alleging Uber ⁠gave "misleading and inaccurate information" ​to Transport for London.
  5. 2026

    FTC inquiry into personalized pricing and compensation

    Investigation

    The U.S. Federal Trade Commission launched an inquiry into whether Delta Air Lines, United Airlines, JetBlue, Lyft, Uber, DoorDash, Instacart, Target and Walmart use consumers' or workers' personal data to set prices or compensation. The agency ordered the companies to provide information as part of the inquiry. The inquiry concerns the potential use of personal data in pricing and compensation decisions across these companies.

    The FTC launched an inquiry into whether Delta Air Lines, United Airlines, JetBlue, Lyft, Uber, DoorDash, Instacart, Target and Walmart use consumers’ or workers’ personal data to set prices or compensation, and ordered the companies to provide information.

    Stated objective. Assess whether prices or worker compensation vary based on personal data.

    Company response

    • Denial — Instacart

      does not and will not engage in surveillance pricing.
    • Denial — JetBlue

      does not use personal information or web browsing history to set individual pricing.
    • Denial — Delta Air Lines

      Delta also denied using personal data to individually price fares

    Source excerpt

    • The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) said it launched an inquiry into nine companies, ordering them to provide information about how they use consumers' and workers' personal data to set prices and compensation.
    • Federal regulators announced Wednesday that they are examining whether major airlines, ride-hailing companies, delivery services and retailers are using personal data to charge different customers different prices for the same products and services or determine how much gig workers are paid.
    • The orders were sent to Delta Air Lines, United Airlines, JetBlue, Lyft, Uber, DoorDash, Instacart, Target and Walmart, according to the FTC.
  6. 2022

    Uber Files disclosures

    A large leak of internal documents covering the Kalanick era described lobbying efforts directed at governments and politicians, relationships with senior officials, and the reported use of a data-access shutdown mechanism during police investigations. The disclosures triggered renewed scrutiny of the company’s political and regulatory conduct.

  7. 2022

    William Good files $63 million suit against Uber

    Lawsuit filed

    William Good filed a $63 million negligence suit against Uber, seeking to hold the rideshare company accountable for injuries from a crash and alleging that its driver screening and business practices were unsafe. These are allegations in the suit; the supplied sources do not report a determination.

    Source excerpt

    • The complaint further states that Good immediately knew he had broken his neck and repeatedly protested the driver's claims that he was uninjured. He is seeking to hold Uber accountable for his injuries, as well as its failure to "appropriately screen, hire and supervise their driver."
    • Will Good, 31, filed a $63 million negligence suit against the rideshare company seeking to hold Uber accountable for his injuries and for its 'unsafe business practices that endanger all driver in Massachusetts,' according to the suit, which was filed Tuesday.
  8. 2021

    Uber pledges additional safety measures for delivery drivers

    Company response

    In April 2021, Uber SA pledged to increase safety campaigns for food delivery drivers and to review the insurance it provides. The pledge followed reporting about risks and accidents involving drivers. The company stated its commitment to these additional safety measures for delivery drivers in South Africa.

    Company response

    • Remediation — Uber

      Uber SA has pledged to increase safety campaigns for food delivery drivers and review the insurance they provide.

    Source excerpt

    • This follows a Thomson Reuters Foundation report about the mounting risks faced by drivers during the Covid-19 pandemic, citing a lack of training and safety equipment coupled with poorly advertised and often insufficient insurance cover.
    • Uber SA has pledged to increase safety campaigns for food delivery drivers and review the insurance they provide.
  9. 2021

    Uber and Lyft pledge legal-fee support for drivers under Texas abortion law

    Company response

    In September 2021, Uber and Lyft stated they would cover legal fees for drivers sued under Texas's abortion law for transporting women seeking abortions. Lyft said it had established a Driver Legal Defense Fund, while Uber CEO Dara Khosrowshahi made a similar commitment on Friday. The companies' statements addressed legal costs faced by drivers under the law.

    Uber and Lyft said they would cover legal fees for drivers sued under Texas's abortion law for transporting women seeking abortions. Lyft said it had established a Driver Legal Defense Fund; Uber CEO Dara Khosrowshahi made a similar commitment on Friday.

    Company response

    • Remediation — Lyft

      Lyft表示,该公司已经设立了一个司机法律辩护基金(Driver Legal Defense Fund),以支付其司机根据该法律可能产生的100%的法律费用。
    • Remediation — Uber

      Uber首席执行官达拉·科斯罗萨西(Dara Khosrowshahi)也在周五做出了类似的承诺,他在一条推文中表示,将为司机支付法律费用。

    Source excerpt

    • Lyft表示,该公司已经设立了一个司机法律辩护基金(Driver Legal Defense Fund),以支付其司机根据该法律可能产生的100%的法律费用。
    • Uber首席执行官达拉·科斯罗萨西(Dara Khosrowshahi)也在周五做出了类似的承诺,他在一条推文中表示,将为司机支付法律费用。
    • Lyft两家打车公司宣布,受德克萨斯州严厉的堕胎法的影响,如果旗下司机因为曾带怀孕六周后的女性接受堕胎而被起诉,Uber和Lyft将承担他们的任何法律费用。
  10. 2021

    New York plaintiff sues Checkr, Uber and Lyft over background check

    Lawsuit filed

    A complaint alleges that Checkr violated the Fair Credit Reporting Act by reporting the plaintiff as deceased in a background check. It also alleges that Uber and Lyft failed to provide him with a required copy of his report and written description of his rights. The plaintiff seeks damages.

    Source excerpt

    • It states one claim for relief against Uber and Lyft and for failing to provide the plaintiff with a statutorily required copy of his background report and a description in writing of his rights.
    • A complaint filed last Friday asserts that Checkr Inc. violated the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) by reporting to Uber Technologies Inc. and Lyft Inc. that the plaintiff was listed as deceased on Social Security Administration’s (SSA) Death Master File.
  11. 2021

    US government sues Uber over disability-related wait time fees

    Lawsuit filed

    The US government filed a lawsuit against Uber, alleging that the company violated anti-discrimination laws by failing to modify wait time fees for passengers with disabilities. In response, Uber stated that it had automatically refunded fees for passengers certified as disabled as of the prior week. The dispute centers on the application of wait time fees to disabled riders and the company's policy for adjusting or refunding those charges.

    The US government sued Uber, alleging it violated anti-discrimination laws by failing to modify wait time fees for passengers with disabilities. Uber said it automatically refunded fees for passengers certified as disabled as of the prior week.

    Company response

    • Refund or compensation — Uber

      The company added that, as of last week, any passengers certified as disabled would have their fees automatically refunded.

    Source excerpt

    • In response, federal prosecutors filed a lawsuit in US District Court for the Northern District of California that’s demands the company stop the alleged discrimination and pay damages, including a civil penalty.
    • After a recent change last week, now any rider who certifies they are disabled will have fees automatically waived.
    • However, Uber denies that it's in violation of the ADA.
  12. 2021

    Uber fined and issued improvement notices after NSW audit

    Fine or penalty

    The NSW Point to Point Transport Commission fined Uber $203,500 and issued 13 improvement notices following an audit. The audit found that Uber had failed to report more than 500 serious incidents, including sexual assaults and crashes resulting in hospitalisations, and identified concerns about driver fatigue and safety systems.

    Company response

    • Clarification — Uber

      'For example, the driver fatigue finding is misrepresented, referring to 'continuous driving time', when it actually includes the cumulative time a driver may be online, offline and then online again throughout the day.'

    Source excerpt

    • A later audit by Uber found another 524 incidents were not reported.
    • A year-long NSW Point to Point Transport Commission audit also found Uber allowed drivers to be on the road for 17 hours straight and failed to address more than 50 drivers reported to be distracted and drowsy.
    • The findings resulted in Uber being fined $203,500 and issued with 13 improvement notices on August 12.
  13. 2021

    Uber announces UK driver reclassification

    Company response

    Uber announced that it would reclassify its UK drivers as workers rather than independent contractors, providing paid leave and pension contributions. The change was reported amid a dispute over employment status and followed a UK Supreme Court ruling concerning some former Uber drivers.

    Source excerpt

    • 优步宣布的这一改变将于周三生效。
    • 报道指出,这一改变将把英国的优步司机重新归类为雇员而不是独立合同工,使英国成为优步直接提供带薪休假和退休金拨款的首个市场。
    • 优步将向其英国司机提供带薪休假和退休金缴款。在一场围绕零工经济雇佣关系的斗争中,这是优步在其最大海外市场之一采取的一个成本高昂的转变。
  14. 2021

    Italian prosecutors fine food delivery platforms over courier employment and safety rules

    Fine or penalty

    Italian prosecutors fined Uber Eats, Glovo, Just Eat and Deliveroo a total of about €733 million over labour safety issues and said the platforms must offer non-permanent contracts with fixed pay to couriers in Italy. The companies were also given 90 days to comply with requests concerning social security, insurance and protective equipment.

    Company response

    • Clarification — Uber

      Over the past months, we have put in place a landmark framework for stronger protections and more benefits for independent couriers in Italy, while working hard to set new standards for health and safety protection

    Source excerpt

    • Companies were given 90 days to comply with the requests.
    • The more than 60,000 couriers who worked for Uber Eats, Glovo, Just Eat and Deliveroo in Italy during 2017-2020 must be offered non-permanent contracts with fixed pay, the Milan prosecutors' office said in a statement.
    • They were also ordered to pay fines totalling some 733 million euros ($900 million) to settle the labour safety issues with Italian authorities, a sum that could rise based on their other infractions.
  15. 2020

    Uber challenges Colombia’s suspension order through international arbitration

    Lawsuit filed

    Uber brought a case against Colombia before an international arbitration committee, arguing that an order to suspend its services violated the free trade agreement between the United States and Colombia. Colombia’s State Defense Attorney confirmed the suit. The source report does not state when the case was filed. The dispute concerns the suspension order and Uber’s claim that it breached the applicable free trade agreement.

    Uber sued Colombia before an international arbitration committee, claiming that an order to suspend its services violated the free trade agreement with the United States. Colombia’s State Defense Attorney confirmed the suit; the article does not state when it was filed.

    Source excerpt

    • Colombia’s Superintendency for Industry and Commerce (SIC) ordered the immediate suspension of services of the US company last month, claiming it was competing unfairly with local taxi companies.
    • Taxi app Uber is suing Colombia before an international arbitration committee, claiming that a recent order to suspend its services is in violation of the free trade agreement with the United States.
  16. 2020

    Mother sues Uber over son's ride to Atlanta

    Lawsuit filed

    A Mount Pleasant mother sued Uber, alleging that a driver picked up her underage son from school and drove him to Atlanta. The lawsuit claims negligence and seeks actual and punitive damages; the allegations are not presented as a court finding.

    Source excerpt

    • The lawsuit filed Thursday states the boy took the trip because he wanted to run the bases at the Braves stadium.
    • A Mount Pleasant mother has sued Uber claiming her underage son was picked up from school alone by a driver, who then took the child to Atlanta.
    • Wintz is suing the rideshare company for negligence, citing Uber policy that anyone under 18 must be accompanied by someone 18 years of age or older on any ride.
  17. 2020

    Uber sues Los Angeles over scooter and bike location-data rules

    Lawsuit filed

    Uber sued the City of Los Angeles in federal court, arguing that the city's requirements for sharing real-time trip data violate constitutional protections. The lawsuit seeks to prevent the city's Transportation Department from implementing or enforcing the geolocation requirements.

    Source excerpt

    • The Silicon Valley giant, which owns the scooter and bike company Jump, escalated that battle on Tuesday by suing the city in federal court.
    • Uber's 44-page complaint argues that L.A.'s data-sharing requirements violate the protections against unreasonable search and seizure in the 4th Amendment and the California Constitution.
    • Uber's lawyers asked a federal judge to prevent the Transportation Department from "taking any actions to implement or enforce" the geolocation requirements, including "any actions to deny, withhold, withdraw or cancel a permit for Jump to operate in the city."
  18. 2020

    California sues Uber and Lyft over driver classification

    Lawsuit filed

    California filed a lawsuit against Uber and Lyft alleging that the companies misclassified drivers as independent contractors under the state's labor law. The lawsuit also alleges that the companies did not pay enough payroll taxes as a result of the classification. The suit seeks restitution, civil penalties, and a permanent ruling barring the practice.

    California sued Uber and Lyft, alleging that they misclassified drivers as independent contractors under the state's labor law. The lawsuit also alleges that the companies did not pay enough payroll taxes as a result of the classification and seeks restitution, civil penalties, and a permanent ruling barring the practice.

    Company response

    • Denial — Uber

      On Tuesday, Uber said it would fight the lawsuit. "At a time when California's economy is in crisis with four million people out of work, we need to make it easier, not harder, for people to quickly start earning," the company said. "We will contest this action in court, while at the same time pushing to raise the standard of independent work for drivers in California, including with guaranteed minimum earnings and new benefits."

    Source excerpt

    • The ride-hailing giants Uber and Lyft shirk state law by misclassifying their California drivers as independent contractors, according to a lawsuit filed Tuesday by the state and several cities.
    • In a 27-page lawsuit filed in the San Francisco County Superior Court, California Attorney General Xavier Becerra says Uber and Lyft do not compensate their drivers for time refueling, maintaining their vehicles, rest breaks and time spent monitoring the respective ride-hailing apps.
    • The state of California is suing Uber and Lyft for classifying their drivers as contractors instead of employees.
  19. 2020

    Pepa sues Uber over 2018 crash

    Lawsuit filed

    Sandra Denton, known as Pepa, filed a lawsuit against Uber and several drivers, alleging that a 2018 chain-reaction crash caused her injuries, pain, and lost wages. The source reports her claims and does not establish a court determination. This entry records the filing of the lawsuit and the allegations as reported, without any finding of liability or additional details beyond those stated.

    Sandra Denton, known as Pepa, is suing Uber and several drivers, alleging that a 2018 chain-reaction crash caused injuries, pain, and lost wages. The source reports her claims and does not establish a court determination.

    Source excerpt

    • Sandra Denton -- aka Pepa from Salt-N-Pepa -- is suing the ride-share service along with one of its drivers and the drivers of 3 other vehicles, claiming a 2018 chain-reaction car crash left her with injuries, pain, and loss of wages.
    • William Good, 31, of Somerville, alleges in the lawsuit that Uber “failed to appropriately screen, hire and supervise their driver, resulting in severe and life-changing injuries to Mr. Good, who is now a quadriplegic.”
    • A Massachusetts man who was left a quadriplegic when his Uber vehicle crashed last year is seeking $63 million in damages in a negligence lawsuit he has filed against the ride-hailing platform.
  20. 2020

    Uber drivers sue over access to personal data

    Lawsuit filed

    A group of UK Uber drivers sued Uber's Dutch subsidiary in Amsterdam, seeking access to more personal data collected about them and asking the court to order compliance with GDPR. The drivers allege that Uber has not complied with the regulation; the article does not report a court determination.

    Company response

    • Clarification — Uber

      当我们无法提供某些数据,如数据根本就不存在,或者披露此类数据会侵犯GDPR规则中其他人的权利时,我们会给出解释。

    Source excerpt

    • 该诉讼由来自英国伦敦、伯明翰、诺丁汉和格拉斯哥四个地区的优步司机在阿姆斯特丹(优步欧洲总部所在地)地区法院提起,而且获得了App Drivers & Couriers Union(ADCU)的支持。
    • 优步的一名发言人表示,公司正“努力”遵守GDPR的数据要求,但是无法满足所有要求。
    • 一群英国优步(Uber)司机正起诉优步荷兰子公司,要求获得更多由该公司收集的有关他们个人的数据,其中包括“个人资料和自动决策”等信息,而且此类数据符合欧盟的数据保护通用条例(GDPR)。