Skip to content

Truvia

A stevia-based sweetener brand developed by Cargill and The Coca-Cola Company.

Last updated August 21, 2026

AI crawler reads

No AI crawler has read this profile since Oct 28, 2026.

Overview

Truvia is a consumer sweetener brand based primarily on extracts from the stevia plant. It was developed jointly by Cargill and The Coca-Cola Company and launched in the United States in 2008. Cargill markets and distributes the brand and also uses Truvia-branded sweetening systems as food ingredients. The brand was introduced during a period of growing consumer interest in lower-calorie alternatives to table sugar and in naturally sourced sweetening ingredients. Truvia tabletop products generally combine stevia leaf extract with erythritol, a sugar alcohol, and natural flavorings. The precise formulation varies by product. Steviol glycosides provide the high-intensity sweetness associated with stevia, while erythritol supplies bulk and helps make the product usable in packets, spoonable containers, and baking applications. Cargill describes the core product as calorie-free. A single-serve packet is marketed as providing sweetness comparable to approximately two teaspoons of sugar, although the physical amount of sweetener is much smaller. The brand's consumer range has included single-serve packets in several pack sizes, spoonable granulated sweetener, liquid products, and reduced-calorie blends combining stevia sweetener with cane sugar or brown sugar. These formats allow Truvia to compete both as a tabletop sweetener and as an ingredient for cooking and baking. The brand's competitive set includes Splenda, Equal, Sweet'N Low, table sugar, and other stevia products such as Stevia In The Raw. Truvia has also been used as a sweetening ingredient in packaged beverages and other food products. Reference material associated with the brand has identified applications in products such as vitamin-water beverages, Sprite Green, All Sport Naturally Zero, Blue Sky Free, Crystal Light Pure, and selected Odwalla juices. These applications illustrate the distinction between Truvia as a branded retail product and Truvia sweetening systems supplied for use by food and beverage manufacturers. The brand's positioning has centered on a combination of stevia's plant origin, zero or reduced calories, and convenience. That positioning has also generated legal scrutiny. In 2013, several class-action complaints alleged that describing Truvia as natural was misleading because the finished sweetener involved substantial processing and included erythritol. Cargill settled related litigation rather than proceeding to trial; a 2014 settlement was reported at $6.1 million. The dispute made the wording of natural-food claims an important part of Truvia's public history. In the United States, Truvia became a significant challenger in the sugar-substitute category after its launch. Reference material describes it as the second-best-selling sugar substitute by unit sales in the country, behind Splenda and ahead of Equal and Sweet'N Low, and as the second-largest stevia brand behind Stevia In The Raw. These rankings are time-specific and may change with market conditions. Truvia's business therefore spans branded retail sweeteners, baking products, and ingredient supply rather than being limited to one packet format.

History

Truvia emerged from the commercial development of high-purity stevia sweeteners by Cargill and The Coca-Cola Company. Its 2008 United States launch placed a branded stevia product into a mature sugar-substitute market already populated by products based on sucralose, aspartame, saccharin, and sugar. The launch responded to demand for sweetening options that could be presented as plant-derived and lower in calories than sucrose. The brand's formulation uses stevia leaf extract together with erythritol and natural flavorings, with the mix varying according to the format. Stevia extract contributes intense sweetness, while erythritol provides bulk and a sugar-like handling characteristic. This combination enabled Truvia to be sold in small packets, larger spoonable packages, and baking-oriented blends. Cargill became responsible for the brand's marketing and distribution and extended the Truvia name beyond the retail tabletop product into food-ingredient applications. The retail line developed around several use cases. Packets were designed for consumers sweetening hot or cold foods and drinks. Spoonable formats addressed household use, while cane-sugar and brown-sugar blends were intended to reduce the calorie content of recipes without eliminating the functional role of sugar entirely. Truvia sweetening systems were also identified as ingredients in a range of packaged beverages and other products, including vitamin-water beverages, Sprite Green, All Sport Naturally Zero, Blue Sky Free, Crystal Light Pure, and some Odwalla juices. Regulatory developments helped shape the broader stevia category. In 2011, the European Union's Standing Committee on Food Chain and Animal Health recommended approval of high-purity stevia extracts for food use throughout the EU. This was relevant to stevia-based sweetener brands because regulatory acceptance expanded the potential market for the ingredient, although it did not itself constitute a Truvia product launch in every European market. Truvia also became associated with debate over the meaning of natural-food claims. In 2013, four class-action lawsuits alleged that Cargill's natural positioning was misleading because the product's stevia extract and erythritol were processed ingredients. The cases reflected wider uncertainty in the United States over how the term natural should be applied to formulated foods. Cargill chose to settle related litigation out of court, and a 2014 settlement was reported at $6.1 million. The controversy is a significant part of the brand's history because it challenged one of the central ideas used to differentiate Truvia from artificial sweeteners. Following its launch, Truvia became a major participant in the United States sugar-substitute category. Reference material describes it as the country's second-best-selling sugar substitute by units, behind Splenda, and as a leading stevia brand behind Stevia In The Raw. Those assessments are tied to the periods and measures reported in the source and should not be treated as permanent rankings. The brand's documented scope includes consumer sweeteners, reduced-calorie baking blends, liquid formats, and ingredient solutions. Information about current ownership structure, executive leadership, detailed international operations, and present-day sales is not established in the supplied reference material.

  • 2014

    Advertising litigation settlement

    [1]

    Cargill settled related false- and misleading-advertising litigation; the reported settlement was $6.1 million.

  • 2013

    Natural-marketing lawsuits

    [1]

    Four class-action complaints challenged the description of Truvia as natural, citing the processing of its stevia extract and erythritol components.

  • 2011

    EU stevia approval recommendation

    [1]

    An EU food-safety committee recommended approval of high-purity stevia extracts for use as food ingredients throughout the European Union.

  • 2008

    United States launch

    [1]

    Cargill and The Coca-Cola Company launched Truvia as a stevia-based sugar substitute for consumers.

Products and positioning

Plant-based stevia sweetness with zero- or reduced-calorie alternatives to table sugar.

  • Tabletop sweetener · 2008

    Truvia Natural Sweetener

    The core consumer product is a packet-format sweetener made with stevia leaf extract, erythritol, and natural flavorings. It is marketed for sweetening foods and beverages and is sold in multiple single-serve pack counts in the United States. The product is positioned as calorie-free and as an alternative to sugar and other tabletop sweeteners.

  • Granulated tabletop sweetener

    Truvia Spoonable

    A larger-container format intended for household spooning and measuring rather than individual packet use. The United States product has been described as a 9.8-ounce container with sweetening capacity comparable to an 80-count packet box.

  • Baking blend

    Truvia Cane Sugar Blend

    A reduced-calorie blend combining cane sugar with stevia sweetener. It is designed for cooking and baking applications where consumers want to retain some of sugar's functional and sensory characteristics while lowering the total calorie contribution.

  • Baking blend

    Truvia Brown Sugar Blend

    A reduced-calorie baking blend based on brown sugar and stevia sweetener. It extends the brand into recipe use and is intended as a substitute or partial substitute for conventional brown sugar.

  • Food ingredient

    Truvia food-ingredient systems

    Cargill also supplies Truvia-branded sweetening ingredients for use in manufactured foods and beverages. Documented applications include selected reduced- or zero-calorie drinks and other products, demonstrating that the brand operates both as a retail label and as an ingredient platform.

Controversies

  • 2014

    False-advertising settlement

    A settlement related to allegations of false and misleading advertising concerning Truvia's natural positioning was reported at $6.1 million.

  • 2013

    Challenge to Truvia's naturalness claims

    Four class-action lawsuits alleged that consumers could be misled by Truvia's use of the term natural because the product contained processed stevia leaf extract and erythritol. Cargill settled related claims out of court.

Read more

Brand decisions

  • 2014

    Settle naturalness-related advertising litigationOther

    Background

    Class-action plaintiffs challenged whether Truvia could be marketed as natural when its ingredients were processed and included erythritol.

    Action taken

    Cargill settled related claims out of court rather than taking the litigation to trial.

    Aftermath

    The reported settlement amount was $6.1 million and the dispute became a notable qualification to the brand's natural positioning.

    Reported settlement amount. $6.1 million (2014)

  • 2008

    Enter the branded stevia tabletop marketProduct launch

    Background

    The developers sought to establish a consumer brand for high-intensity stevia sweetening in a market dominated by sugar and established artificial sweetener brands.

    Action taken

    Cargill and The Coca-Cola Company launched Truvia in the United States as a stevia-based tabletop sweetener.

    Aftermath

    The brand expanded into additional tabletop formats, baking blends, and ingredient applications.

Recent events

  • 2011

    European food authorities recommend approval of high-purity stevia extracts[1]

    Regulation

    The European Union's Standing Committee on Food Chain and Animal Health recommended approval of high-purity stevia extracts for use as a food ingredient across the EU.

  • 2008

    Truvia launches in the United States[1]

    Product launch

    Cargill and The Coca-Cola Company introduced Truvia as a stevia-based tabletop sweetener.

Sources1 sources

Cite this profile: Cite the canonical profile. /brand-wiki/truvia · Editorial policy · How profiles are compiled