Skip to content

Texas Freedom Network

Professional services

UnclaimedRequest correction

A Texas-based advocacy organization focused on religious freedom, civil liberties, public education, and related social-justice issues.

Last updated August 25, 2026

AI crawler reads

No AI crawler has read this profile since Oct 28, 2026.

Overview

Texas Freedom Network (TFN) is a Texas-based advocacy organization that describes its mission around protecting religious freedom, defending civil liberties, and strengthening public schools. Its work is principally directed at public-policy debates in Texas, especially disputes involving the State Board of Education, curriculum standards, sex education, evolution, Bible courses, school prayer, LGBTQ+ rights, and the relationship between religion and government. The organization positions itself as a counterweight to efforts associated with the Christian right and other religiously conservative activists in state politics. TFN emerged from concern about the direction of Texas education policy in the mid-1990s. Cecile Richards attended a Texas State Board of Education meeting in January 1995 and later described being alarmed by what she regarded as attempts by far-right activists to reshape discussion of health textbooks. The issues she identified included attacks on sex education, hostility toward LGBT people, and other subjects that could mobilize religious-right constituencies. Richards and her colleague Harriett Peppel subsequently organized the Texas Freedom Network, which was established on February 17, 1995. During Richards's leadership, education was the organization's principal area of concentration. Under Samantha Smoot, who led the organization from 1998 through 2004, TFN broadened its policy agenda to include hate-crime issues and gay rights. It continued to monitor the Texas State Board of Education and to challenge initiatives that it believed substituted sectarian doctrine for academically grounded instruction or threatened the separation of church and state. The organization opposed efforts associated with Don McLeroy and other religious conservatives to require or promote Bible courses in Texas high schools and to revise history standards in ways TFN considered ideologically driven. TFN has also used research and expert analysis to support its advocacy. In 2005 it criticized the National Council on Bible Curriculum in Public Schools, arguing that the curriculum presented a fundamentalist Christian interpretation and was unsuitable for public-school use. The organization commissioned a review by Southern Methodist University biblical scholar Mark A. Chancey, whose findings were summarized as identifying sectarian bias, historical and scientific distortions, factual errors, and weak sourcing. TFN has separately addressed the teaching of evolution, including through a survey of Texas scientists about whether alleged weaknesses in evolutionary theory constitute valid scientific objections. Sexuality education became another significant area of activity. A TFN-funded study by two Texas State University researchers, published in February 2009 under the title "Just Say Don't Know: Sexuality Education in Texas Public Schools," examined the quality of information presented to students and reported that students were often given misleading or inaccurate descriptions of the risks associated with sex. The study supported TFN's broader criticism of abstinence-focused or poorly sourced sex-education policies. As of January 2025, Felicia Martin is identified as TFN's president and executive director. The organization remains a Texas-focused advocacy network rather than a commercial product brand. Its public role is expressed through policy monitoring, research, public education, coalition activity, and criticism of legislation or administrative decisions that it views as weakening religious pluralism, civil liberties, scientific integrity, or public-school quality. The supplied reference material also reports membership exceeding 150,000 as of 2026; because that figure is future-dated relative to the stated leadership reference and no independently verified source is supplied here, it is not treated as a definitive current operating statistic.

History

Texas Freedom Network was created in response to growing concern among some Texas activists that religiously conservative groups were exerting excessive influence over public education and state policy. The immediate catalyst was Cecile Richards's attendance at a Texas State Board of Education meeting in January 1995. Richards later said that she was surprised by the intensity of attacks on sex education, LGBT people, and other issues during discussions about health textbooks. She and Harriett Peppel organized a response, and the Texas Freedom Network was established on February 17, 1995. The organization's early work centered on education. TFN followed State Board of Education proceedings and advocated for public-school policies that it considered academically credible, religiously neutral, and protective of civil liberties. It became involved in disputes over the teaching of evolution, sex education, school prayer, and the treatment of religion in curriculum. A recurring concern was that public schools might present particular theological positions as objective academic instruction or use state authority to promote one religious tradition. Leadership under Samantha Smoot from 1998 to 2004 expanded TFN's scope. In addition to education, the organization addressed hate crimes and gay rights, establishing a broader connection between religious liberty, equal treatment, and civil rights. This expansion shaped TFN's identity as an advocacy network rather than a single-issue education group. One of the organization's notable education interventions involved Bible-study curricula. In 2005, TFN criticized materials produced by the National Council on Bible Curriculum in Public Schools. It commissioned Mark A. Chancey, a biblical-studies scholar at Southern Methodist University, to review the curriculum. The review, as summarized in the reference material, identified sectarian bias, historical and scientific distortions, factual problems, and inadequate sourcing. TFN used the findings to argue that the materials were inappropriate for public-school systems and inconsistent with religious freedom. TFN also participated in the debate over evolution education. A survey commissioned by the organization asked Texas scientists whether claimed weaknesses in evolutionary theory represented valid scientific objections. The reported results indicated strong rejection of that proposition, reinforcing TFN's argument that science classrooms should distinguish between scientific evidence and religiously motivated challenges to evolution. Sexuality education remained another continuing issue. In February 2009, researchers at Texas State University published a TFN-funded study titled "Just Say Don't Know: Sexuality Education in Texas Public Schools." The study reported that students were frequently exposed to misleading or inaccurate claims about the risks associated with sex. The research became part of TFN's criticism of Texas sexuality-education policy and of instructional approaches that, in its view, sacrificed accuracy for ideological messaging. The organization has also opposed efforts linked to Don McLeroy and other religious conservatives to require Bible courses in Texas high schools or revise history standards. TFN's position has been that curriculum standards should be based on sound scholarship and that public institutions must preserve the separation of church and state. These disputes have placed the group in sustained opposition to conservative religious activists while making it an advocate for pluralism, civil liberties, public education, LGBTQ+ rights, and evidence-based instruction. As of January 2025, Felicia Martin is identified as president and executive director. The available material does not provide a complete chronology of board members, office locations, budgets, or all organizational programs. TFN remains an active Texas-focused advocacy organization, with its public identity rooted in policy research, education monitoring, coalition-building, and campaigns concerning religion, civil rights, and public schools.

  • 2025

    Felicia Martin leads the organization

    [1]

    Felicia Martin is identified as president and executive director as of January 2025.

  • 2009

    Sexuality-education study is published

    [1]

    A TFN-funded Texas State University study reports problems with the accuracy of sexuality education in Texas public schools.

  • 2005

    Bible-curriculum review is commissioned

    [1]

    TFN commissions Mark A. Chancey's academic review of a Bible curriculum used in public schools.

  • 2004

    End of Samantha Smoot's stated leadership period

    [1]

    The reference material identifies 2004 as the end of Samantha Smoot's leadership period.

  • 1998

    Policy scope broadens under Samantha Smoot

    [1]

    TFN expands its focus from education to include hate crimes and gay rights.

  • 1995

    Texas Freedom Network is established

    [1]

    Cecile Richards and Harriett Peppel establish TFN after concerns about religious-right influence in Texas State Board of Education debates.

Products and positioning

A Texas-focused progressive advocacy organization that combines public-school, religious-freedom, civil-liberties, and social-justice work, often opposing efforts to introduce sectarian religious influence into public policy and education.

  • Research and advocacy

    Education policy research

    TFN produces or commissions analysis of Texas public-school policy, curriculum standards, science education, sexuality education, and the role of religion in schools. These materials support the organization's public campaigns and policy criticism.

  • Civil-liberties advocacy · 1995

    Religious-freedom advocacy

    The organization advocates for government neutrality toward religion and challenges policies it believes promote sectarian teaching or weaken church-state separation, including certain Bible-course and curriculum proposals.

  • Community advocacy

    Public-school and civil-rights campaigns

    TFN's advocacy has included public education, evolution instruction, sex education, LGBTQ+ rights, hate-crime policy, and opposition to mandatory school prayer. The work is directed primarily at Texas institutions and public debate.

Marketing campaigns

  • 2009Texas sexuality-education research campaign

    Texas

    TFN funded research examining the accuracy of sexuality education in Texas public schools and used the findings to criticize misleading instruction.

    Outcome. The study documented concerns about inaccurate or misleading information; the supplied material does not establish a specific policy change resulting from it.

  • 2005Bible curriculum neutrality campaign

    Texas

    TFN challenged the use of a Bible-study curriculum in public schools, arguing that its presentation of Christianity was sectarian and that its academic claims were unreliable.

    Outcome. The organization publicized an academic review that criticized the curriculum's bias, accuracy, and sourcing. A broader policy outcome is not stated in the supplied material.

Brand decisions

  • 2009

    Fund research on sexuality educationStrategy

    Background

    TFN was concerned that Texas students were receiving inaccurate or ideologically shaped information about sexual health.

    Action taken

    The organization funded a study by two Texas State University researchers.

    Aftermath

    The resulting report described misleading and inaccurate information in many cases, supporting TFN's advocacy for more reliable sexuality education.

  • 2005

    Commission an independent review of Bible-course materialsStrategy

    Background

    TFN disputed the neutrality and academic quality of the National Council on Bible Curriculum in Public Schools materials.

    Action taken

    It commissioned biblical-studies scholar Mark A. Chancey to evaluate the curriculum.

    Aftermath

    The reported review identified sectarian bias, factual problems, weak sourcing, and distortions of history and science. No wider institutional outcome is specified.

Sources2 sources

Cite this profile: Cite the canonical profile. /brand-wiki/texas-freedom-network · Editorial policy · How profiles are compiled