Skip to content

Citizens for Tax Justice

Professional services

UnclaimedRequest correction

Citizens for Tax Justice is a Washington, D.C.-based tax-policy think tank and advocacy organization focused on the distributional and revenue effects of federal, state, and local taxation.

Last updated August 25, 2026

AI crawler reads

No AI crawler has read this profile since Oct 28, 2026.

Overview

Citizens for Tax Justice (CTJ) is a United States tax-policy research and advocacy organization founded in 1979. Based in Washington, D.C., it examines how tax rules affect households, businesses, government revenues, and economic inequality. Its work is primarily oriented toward federal tax policy, while also addressing state and local taxes. CTJ emerged in response to the growth of the anti-tax movement and the passage of California Proposition 13. It was established by labor unions and public-interest groups that sought to make the distributional consequences of tax policy more visible in public debate. Soon afterward, the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy (ITEP) was created as a related 501(c)(3) research organization. CTJ itself operates as a 501(c)(4) social-welfare organization. The organization is generally characterized as liberal or progressive in its policy orientation, particularly because it commonly advocates for a more progressive tax system, limits on corporate tax avoidance, and greater transparency about who benefits from tax legislation. Its research has nevertheless been used by lawmakers and commentators across the political spectrum, including some Republican politicians and organizations that otherwise disagree with CTJ's preferred policy outcomes. CTJ became especially prominent during the debate leading to the Tax Reform Act of 1986. A sequence of reports released between 1984 and 1986 analyzed the effective tax rates of large corporations and argued that corporate tax shelters and preferential provisions had substantially weakened the tax base. The reports helped frame corporate tax reform as an issue of fairness and public accountability. Contemporary and later observers credited the work with contributing to public pressure for legislation that broadened the corporate tax base, curtailed tax shelters, and changed individual tax rates. The organization has also played an important informational role when official distributional analyses were unavailable or politically constrained. During the 2001 debate over the Bush tax cuts, CTJ used the ITEP Microsimulation Tax Model to estimate the effects of the proposed legislation on taxpayers at different income levels. Its analysis became a major source for opponents of the proposal and was frequently cited by journalists and legislators, although the tax cuts were ultimately enacted. During the 2009 health-care reform debate, CTJ published analyses of possible financing mechanisms for the proposed Affordable Care Act. An expansion of the Medicare tax that CTJ had proposed was incorporated into the legislation enacted in 2010. More generally, CTJ evaluates tax proposals from presidents, presidential candidates, members of Congress, and other public officials, often publishing estimates of revenue effects and changes in tax burdens. CTJ's output includes policy reports, corporate tax-rate studies, distributional tables, public commentary, and testimony before Congress and other public bodies. Many analyses rely on the ITEP Microsimulation Tax Model, which is housed at ITEP. The organization is funded by donations from individuals, labor unions, and other organizations. It remains an advocacy-oriented research brand whose influence comes primarily from accessible empirical analysis, media citation, legislative testimony, and participation in national tax-policy campaigns rather than from commercial products.

History

Citizens for Tax Justice was founded in 1979 by labor unions and public-interest organizations reacting to the expansion of the anti-tax movement and the recent success of California Proposition 13. Its founding purpose was to bring distributional and social-equity questions into tax-policy discussions that were often dominated by arguments about tax reduction, economic incentives, or government size. The organization established itself in Washington, D.C., where it could engage with Congress, executive agencies, journalists, and national advocacy networks. A related institution, the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy, was created shortly after CTJ as a 501(c)(3) charitable partner. ITEP developed and housed the microsimulation tools that became central to much of CTJ's quantitative work, while CTJ pursued a more explicitly advocacy-oriented role as a 501(c)(4) social-welfare organization. This relationship allowed the broader CTJ-ITEP network to combine research, public communication, and policy advocacy while maintaining separate organizational structures. CTJ's early and continuing work has focused on the distribution of tax burdens. It analyzes federal income taxes, corporate taxation, tax expenditures, state and local taxes, and proposed changes to tax law. A recurring theme has been that statutory tax rates do not necessarily reveal the taxes actually paid by households or corporations. CTJ therefore uses effective-tax-rate calculations, distributional modeling, and analysis of corporate financial statements to illustrate the practical consequences of tax provisions. The organization's most consequential early period came in the 1980s. CTJ published a series of reports, including Corporate Income Taxes in the Reagan Years, Corporate Taxpayers & Corporate Freeloaders, Money for Nothing: The Failure of Corporate Tax Incentives, 1981–1984, and 130 Reasons Why We Need Tax Reform. These studies highlighted cases in which large corporations paid little or no federal corporate income tax in particular years and argued that tax preferences had undermined both fairness and the revenue base. The findings received substantial media attention and were cited in political discussions about corporate tax reform. Accounts of the period describe the reports as contributing to the public pressure that preceded the Tax Reform Act of 1986. The 1986 Act reduced some tax rates while broadening the tax base, eliminating or limiting numerous tax shelters and preferences. CTJ presented the legislation as a major reform that addressed corporate loopholes and reduced taxes for many low- and middle-income families. Although the organization did not control the legislative process, its research helped supply concrete examples and accessible comparisons for policymakers and the public. The work also demonstrated CTJ's characteristic method: converting technical tax data into comparisons that could be used in public debate. In the late 1980s and early 1990s, CTJ was involved with the Tobacco Institute and labor organizations in opposition to cigarette excise-tax increases. The organization argued that such taxes could be regressive and disproportionately burden people with lower incomes. This episode illustrates that CTJ's policy positions have not always aligned mechanically with a single revenue-maximizing or anti-business framework; its analyses have often emphasized the distributional effect of a policy rather than simply whether a tax increases receipts. CTJ remained an influential source of tax-distribution data in later legislative debates. During the 2001 debate over President George W. Bush's tax-cut proposal, official distributional tables were not readily available to opponents. CTJ used the ITEP Microsimulation Tax Model to estimate how the proposal would affect taxpayers across income groups. Its director, Bob McIntyre, became a prominent public source for journalists and lawmakers seeking such estimates. The legislation ultimately passed, but CTJ's role demonstrated the importance of independent organizations in filling gaps in official policy analysis. In 2009, during the debate over health-care reform under President Barack Obama, CTJ modeled possible financing approaches and their distributional consequences. One expansion of the Medicare tax that CTJ had proposed was included in the Affordable Care Act signed into law in 2010. The organization has also regularly analyzed tax proposals made by presidential candidates, members of Congress, and administrations, with its estimates frequently cited by the media and sometimes by the candidates themselves. Today, CTJ operates as a research and advocacy brand centered on tax fairness, corporate accountability, transparency, and the revenue and distributional effects of tax legislation. Its publications commonly draw on ITEP's modeling capacity and on examination of corporate financial statements. Funding is described as coming from individuals, labor unions, and other organizations. The organization is generally viewed as liberal, but its data and reports have been cited by figures and groups outside that ideological category. Its principal influence lies in research, testimony, media engagement, and agenda-setting rather than in the sale of consumer goods or conventional commercial services.

  • 2009

    Health-care financing analysis

    [1]

    CTJ publishes analyses of tax options for financing health-care reform; an expanded Medicare tax it proposed is later included in the Affordable Care Act.

  • 2001

    Distributional analysis of Bush tax cuts

    [1]

    CTJ's ITEP-model estimates become a major source of distributional information for opponents of the proposed federal tax cuts.

  • 1986

    Influence on the Tax Reform Act of 1986

    [1]

    CTJ's corporate-tax reports contribute to public and legislative pressure for broader tax bases, fewer corporate tax shelters, and changes in individual tax rates.

  • 1984

    Corporate-tax research series begins

    [1]

    CTJ releases Corporate Income Taxes in the Reagan Years, beginning a prominent series of studies on corporate effective tax rates and tax avoidance.

  • 1979

    Organization founded

    [1]

    Labor unions and public-interest organizations establish Citizens for Tax Justice in response to the growing anti-tax movement and California's Proposition 13.

Products and positioning

A progressive, evidence-driven tax-policy research and advocacy organization that translates complex tax legislation into analysis of revenue, fairness, and distributional impact.

  • Research publications · 1979

    Tax-policy reports

    CTJ publishes research on federal, state, and local taxation, with recurring attention to tax fairness, revenue adequacy, corporate tax preferences, and the effects of proposed legislation on households at different income levels.

  • Corporate tax research · 1984

    Corporate effective-tax-rate studies

    These studies examine corporate financial statements and related tax data to estimate the effective income-tax rates paid by large companies. They are intended to show how statutory rates, deductions, credits, and tax shelters can produce substantially different real-world outcomes.

  • Tax-policy analysis

    Distributional and revenue modeling

    CTJ uses analyses produced with the ITEP Microsimulation Tax Model to estimate how current and proposed tax policies affect government revenue and taxpayers across income groups. These estimates are used in reports, testimony, media commentary, and legislative debates.

Marketing campaigns

  • 2009Health-care reform financing analysis

    United States

    CTJ evaluated possible tax mechanisms for financing health-care reform and published revenue and distributional analyses.

    Outcome. An expansion of the Medicare tax first proposed by CTJ was incorporated into the Affordable Care Act.

  • 2001Opposition analysis during the Bush tax-cut debate

    United States

    CTJ published distributional estimates of President Bush's proposed tax cuts when opponents had limited access to comparable official analyses.

    Outcome. The tax-cut legislation passed, while CTJ's estimates became widely cited in the political and media debate.

  • 1986Corporate tax reform campaign

    United States

    CTJ used a series of reports on corporate tax avoidance and tax incentives to argue for comprehensive reform of the federal tax code.

    Outcome. The Tax Reform Act of 1986 broadened the tax base and curtailed numerous corporate tax shelters and preferences.

Brand decisions

  • 2009

    Model tax financing options for health-care reformStrategy

    Background

    The health-care reform debate required proposals for financing new coverage and related government spending.

    Action taken

    CTJ analyzed the revenue and distributional effects of several potential financing mechanisms, including an expanded Medicare tax.

    Aftermath

    The proposed Medicare-tax expansion was included in the Affordable Care Act enacted in 2010.

  • 2001

    Use microsimulation to fill distributional-data gapsStrategy

    Background

    Opponents of the proposed Bush tax cuts lacked readily available official distributional tables.

    Action taken

    CTJ released estimates produced with the ITEP Microsimulation Tax Model.

    Aftermath

    Its analysis became a principal source of distributional information during the debate.

  • 1984

    Prioritize corporate effective-tax-rate researchStrategy

    Background

    CTJ sought to make corporate tax avoidance understandable through company-level analysis rather than relying only on aggregate tax statistics.

    Action taken

    The organization began publishing reports comparing the nominal and effective tax payments of large corporations.

    Aftermath

    The research became central to CTJ's public profile and was associated with the debate that led to the 1986 tax reform.

Recent events

  • 2009

    CTJ publishes financing analyses during the health-care reform debate[1]

    Other · Product launch

    CTJ analyzed possible revenue sources for health-care reform, including an expansion of the Medicare tax that was later incorporated into the Affordable Care Act.

  • 2001

    CTJ analysis becomes a major source in the 2001 Bush tax-cut debate[1]

    Other

    Using the ITEP Microsimulation Tax Model, CTJ published estimates of the distributional effects of proposed tax cuts when official analyses were not readily available to opponents of the legislation.

  • 1986

    Citizens for Tax Justice contributes corporate tax analysis to the 1986 tax-reform debate[1]

    Other · Product launch

    CTJ's reports on large-company tax payments and corporate tax incentives helped focus public and legislative attention on corporate tax shelters and contributed to the debate surrounding the Tax Reform Act of 1986.

Sources2 sources

Cite this profile: Cite the canonical profile. /brand-wiki/citizens-for-tax-justice · Editorial policy · How profiles are compiled