Skip to content

Bao's Pastry controversies

Controversies tied to this brand in public sources. A listing is not a finding of fault.

Back to profile5 entries

  1. 2026

    Extra-long egg tarts criticized for too little custard; customer service offers refunds

    In September 2026, consumers complained that Bao's Pastry's extra-long egg tarts contained too little custard. Official customer service said it would coordinate improvements across stores and that refunds could be requested; some complainants confirmed receiving refunds.

  2. 2025

    Spring found in egg tart; store admits employee oversight

    In October 2025, a consumer found a spring in a Bao's Pastry egg tart. The store said it was due to employee oversight, and its initial compensation offer sparked controversy. This entry concerns a foreign-object incident at the store involved.

  3. 2024

    Weighing with packaging questioned as short-weighting, sparking measurement dispute

    In July 2024, Southern Metropolis Daily reported on complaints about Bao's Pastry stores weighing products with packaging and handling weighing issues, prompting consumer doubts about measurement and charging for packaging weight. This entry covers the controversy as reported, not a concluded finding of cheating that had been penalized.

  4. 2024

    Year of the Dragon paper bag misspells DRAGON as DARGON, packaging copy mocked

    In early 2024, consumers noticed a spelling error on Bao's Pastry's Year of the Dragon paper bags, with DRAGON printed as DARGON, triggering controversy over the packaging copy on social media.

  5. 2020

    Court upholds judgment in Bao Shifu trademark dispute

    Ruling

    The Beijing Intellectual Property Court rejected Yishang Company's appeal and upheld a judgment finding that Yishang infringed the Bao Shifu trademark and engaged in unfair competition. The judgment ordered Yishang to stop the conduct, publish a statement to mitigate its effects, and pay more than 3 million yuan in damages and reasonable expenses.

    Source excerpt

    • 近日,“鲍师傅”的商标案有了新进展。北京知识产权法院对鲍才胜公司与北京易尚餐饮管理有限公司(下称易尚公司)商标侵权及不正当竞争案作出终审判决,驳回易尚公司上诉,维持一审判决,即认定易尚公司在其网站、微信公众号等平台及店铺单独或突出使用“鲍师傅”标识,侵犯了鲍才胜公司第12484211号“鲍师傅”的注册商标专用权;同时其未经许可,使用黄底红字“鲍师傅糕点”作为店铺门头,致使相关公众对商品的来源产生混淆误认,还在其公司的声明中多次提到鲍才胜公司的法定代表人及该公司情况,系虚假宣传,构成不正当竞争,判决易尚公司立刻停止上述侵权行为,刊登声明、消除影响,并赔偿鲍才胜公司经济损失及合理开支共计300万余元。