争议事件

品牌回应

• 否认 — DuPont

  We have not received the complaint referenced by the Attorney General’s office, however we are extremely disappointed they have taken this action we believe is without merit.

• 否认 — 3M

  3M disagrees with the allegations in this lawsuit.

来源摘录

• sweeping lawsuit Tuesday in Washtenaw County Circuit Court, alleging 3M, DuPont and other PFAS manufacturers “intentionally hid” known health and environmental risks from the public and state while selling toxic but profitable “forever chemicals” to consumers and corporate customers since the 1950s.

• The suit seeks to hold 17 named companies financially responsible for all past and future costs associated with toxic per- and polyfluoroalkyl contamination at dozens of sites across the state.

• The substances have been detected at levels requiring remediation at more than 70 sites across Michigan.

品牌回应

• 否认 — DuPont de Nemours

  “DuPont de Nemours has never manufactured or sold (aqueous film forming foam). We believe this complaint is without merit, and is the latest example of DuPont being improperly named in litigation.

来源摘录

• “DuPont de Nemours has never manufactured or sold (aqueous film forming foam). We believe this complaint is without merit, and is the latest example of DuPont being improperly named in litigation.

• The attorney general’s lawsuit seeks to require manufacturers of the chemicals to pay for “all costs to investigate, clean up, restore and monitor contamination at all sites in the state where PFAS-containing (aqueous film forming foam) was used, released, spilled, stored or disposed of.”