Skip to content

Yves Rocher controversies

Controversies tied to this brand in public sources. A listing is not a finding of fault.

Back to profile4 entries

  1. 2023

    Criticism over continued Russian operations

    Yves Rocher was criticized after assessments cited in reference material indicated that the company had not withdrawn from Russia following the 2022 invasion of Ukraine. The company's continued market presence led to its inclusion in a Yale-associated list of international sponsors of the Russian war effort.

  2. 2021

    Yves Rocher faces consumer backlash and boycott calls

    Public backlash

    Consumers criticized Yves Rocher over its involvement in the case against Alexei Navalny, and some called for a boycott after his sentence was read out.

    Company response

    • Clarification — Yves Rocher

      The statement explained that Yves Rocher Vostok never filed a complaint against the Navalny brothers or made a legal claim.

    Source excerpt

    • Since his sentence was read out earlier this week, Yves Rocher has received a flurry of abuse on social media, with some consumers calling for a boycott.
    • In a response from Yves Rocher, the French skin care group declared “its total commitment to a respect for individual freedoms”, including those against Navalny, but said it would not “remain silent in the face of unjustified public questionsing”.
    • The statement explained that Yves Rocher Vostok never filed a complaint against the Navalny brothers or made a legal claim.
  3. 2017

    European human-rights ruling on the Yves Rocher case

    The European Court of Human Rights found that the Russian proceedings violated the Navalny brothers' fair-trial rights and were arbitrary and unreasonable. It did not decide the allegation that the case was politically motivated.

  4. 2012

    Navalny-related prosecution in Russia

    Yves Rocher Vostok filed a fraud and money-laundering-related complaint against Alexei and Oleg Navalny. The case became politically controversial, and critics argued that the company's complaint contributed to a politically motivated prosecution. The company did not accept that characterization.