跳到正文

白狐社的争议事件

以下收录公开来源中与该品牌相关的争议事件。列出一条并不表示过错已经证实。

返回词条共 1 条

  1. 2026

    阿迪达斯在澳大利亚联邦法院起诉White Fox 指控侵犯其三条纹商标

    提起诉讼

    阿迪达斯(Adidas)在澳大利亚联邦法院起诉澳大利亚线上快时尚零售商White Fox,指控其销售带四条纹设计的服装与阿迪达斯的三条纹商标构成近似、并借其声誉牟利。阿迪达斯称White Fox多次拒绝停止销售及推广四条纹服装的请求,并寻求法院命令禁止其继续生产四条纹服装且交出相关产品利润。该诉讼于2026年9月提起;2026年10月9日(周五)案件首次开庭,White Fox的律师表示公司将主张四条纹仅为装饰用途而非商标性使用,法院已将案件排期至2027年初审理。

    当事方说明的目的. 阿迪达斯寻求法院命令,禁止White Fox继续生产四条纹服装,并迫使其交出相关产品所获利润。

    品牌回应

    • 否认 — White Fox

      White Fox’s barrister Ed Heerey KC said the Australian company would argue the four stripes emblazoned on the label’s clothing were simply decorative rather than a trademark.
    • 否认 — White Fox

      White Fox's legal team has defended the move, claiming that other Australian brands like Cotton On and Sportscraft sell items with "similar decorative stripes".
    • 否认 — White Fox Boutique

    来源摘录

    • Global sportswear brand Adidas claims Australian label White Fox is trying to trade off its reputation by infringing its distinctive three-stripe trademark.
    • Adidas is suing the online fast-fashion retailer in the Federal Court for selling clothes with a four-stripe design, which it argues is deceptively similar to its classic design.
    • This might lead Australians to think Adidas is associated with White Fox and has approved of the design, the documents claim.