Skip to content

TransUnion controversies

Controversies tied to this brand in public sources. A listing is not a finding of fault.

Back to profile10 entries

  1. 2026

    TransUnion controversy: Frontline Education data breach exposed Lubbock ISD employee personal information

    Issue disclosure

    Frontline Education notified Lubbock ISD on October 6, 2026 that a security incident occurring on August 14, 2026 exposed employee Social Security numbers, email addresses and physical addresses; the district says district leadership was not notified until more than seven weeks after the incident, and Frontline told the district that no student information was exposed. Frontline says it discovered and remediated the incident on August 15, plans to begin contacting affected individuals on October 26, has notified the Texas Attorney General and law enforcement agencies, and is partnering with TransUnion to provide two years of credit monitoring to affected people.

    Company response

    • Remediation — Frontline Education

    • Refund or compensation — Frontline Education

    • Ongoing disclosure — Frontline Education

      Frontline plans to begin contacting affected individuals on October 26th.
    • Ongoing disclosure — Frontline Education

      Frontline has also notified the Texas Attorney General and law enforcement agencies

    Source excerpt

    • According to information provided to Lubbock ISD by Frontline Education, the security incident occurred on August 14th, 2026.
    • Frontline has told the district that no Lubbock ISD student information was exposed in the incident.
    • Lubbock ISD announced Tuesday, October 6th, that employee Social Security numbers were among the information exposed during a security incident involving Frontline Education.
  2. 2026

    Loblaw discloses breach impact and begins customer notifications

    Issue disclosure

    Loblaw stated that it was beginning to notify approximately two million Canadians affected by a data breach that occurred in March. The company said the notifications include details about which personal information was exposed. According to Loblaw, the information involved varied by customer. The disclosure concerns the scope of the breach's impact on affected individuals and the start of customer notifications.

    Loblaw said it was starting to notify about two million Canadians affected by a March data breach, with details about which personal information was exposed. It said the information involved varied by customer.

    Company response

    • Ongoing disclosure — Loblaw

      Loblaw says it is starting to notify about two million Canadians who were affected by a data breach in March with specifics about which personal information of theirs leaked.
    • Remediation — Loblaw

      It is offering complimentary credit monitoring and identity restoration services through TransUnion.

    Source excerpt

    • It is offering complimentary credit monitoring and identity restoration services through TransUnion.
    • Loblaw says it is starting to notify about two million Canadians who were affected by a data breach in March with specifics about which personal information of theirs leaked.
    • The company said in March that it detected suspicious activity on its IT network and determined an unauthorized third party had accessed some basic customer information but didn’t disclose how many customers were affected at the time.
  3. 2022

    TransUnion South Africa data-breach claims

    TransUnion South Africa disclosed a server intrusion after an extortion group claimed to have taken data involving approximately 54 million customers and demanded payment.

  4. 2020

    TransUnion sued over alleged use of watch-list data in consumer reports

    Lawsuit filed

    A class action complaint filed in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania alleged that TransUnion included terrorist watch-list information in consumer reports in violation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act. The allegations were not stated as a court determination. The event was reported in 2020.

    Source excerpt

    • [1] Al-Shaikli v. TransUnion, LLC, 5:20-cv-04155 (E.D. PA. August 24, 2020).
    • Earlier this week, one of the “big three” credit bureaus was sued in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania over an alleged practice that the Ninth Circuit and the Third Circuit had previously determined violated the FCRA in unrelated class action litigation against the same credit bureau.
    • The class action complaint alleges that TransUnion, LLC (“TransUnion”) included information found on terrorist watch lists in its consumer reports in violation of the FCRA.
  5. 2017

    CFPB enforcement over credit-score products and subscriptions

    The CFPB announced a $5.5 million civil penalty and $17.6 million in restitution involving TransUnion and alleged deception about the value and cost of credit scores and recurring payments for credit-related products.

  6. 2017

    Fair Credit Reporting Act security-list verdict

    A California jury awarded $60 million in a case alleging that TransUnion falsely reported consumers as associated with terrorism and other government security lists.

  7. 2017

    TransUnion Central America website compromise

    The Central American division's website was reported to have redirected visitors toward malware downloads after third-party analytics JavaScript was compromised.

  8. 2015

    New York consumer-reporting settlement

    TransUnion and the other major U.S. credit-reporting companies agreed to procedures intended to improve the handling of disputed errors and consumer red flags, including use of trained personnel to communicate with data furnishers.

  9. 2006

    Identity-theft reporting litigation

    A consumer who said identity theft had produced erroneous credit information sued the three major U.S. credit bureaus. TransUnion and Experian settled outside court for undisclosed amounts.

  10. 2003

    Lawsuit over inaccurate credit information

    Judy Thomas of Oregon won a lawsuit against TransUnion after reportedly spending six years seeking removal of incorrect information from her credit report. The award was reported as $5.3 million.