跳到正文

Substack的争议事件

以下收录公开来源中与该品牌相关的争议事件。列出一条并不表示过错已经证实。

返回词条共 4 条

  1. 2023

    关于极端主义和仇恨内容的争议

    在作家和倡导团体反对平台上的白人至上主义、纳粹和反犹太主义出版物后,Substack 面临批评。几位创作者威胁要离开或离开,而联合创始人哈米什·麦肯齐为该公司的宽松审核理念辩护。

  2. 2022

    对反疫苗内容的批评

    反数字仇恨中心批评 Substack 允许反疫苗作家将内容变现,认为这些内容对公共健康有害。Substack 的创始人捍卫了最低限度审查的方法。

  3. 2021

    Substack因向作者提供预付款及内容标准面临批评

    公众反弹

    在Substack发布内容的作者批评该平台向部分作者提供预付款,认为这使平台看起来也在作出编辑决策。部分作者表示将离开该平台。Substack联合创始人Hamish McKenzie称这些交易是商业决定而非编辑决定,创始人还发布了该计划的更多信息。

    品牌回应

    • 澄清 — Substack

      “We see these deals as business decisions, not editorial ones,” McKenzie wrote.
    • 持续披露 — Substack

      The second post (bylined by McKenzie and his co-founders Chris Best and Jairaj Sethi) provides additional details about who’s in the program — more than half women, more than one-third people of color, diverse viewpoints but “none that can be reasonably construed as anti-trans” — without actually naming names.

    来源摘录

    • Last week, the writer Jude Ellison Sady Doyle pointed to writers like Yglesias, Glenn Greenwald and Freddie deBoer (several of whom departed larger publications, supposedly turning to Substack for greater editorial independence) and suggested that the platform has become “famous for giving massive advances [ … ] to people who actively hate trans people and women, argue ceaselessly against our civil rights, and in many cases, have a public history of directly, viciously abusing trans people and/or cis women in their industry.”
    • Substack has responded with two posts of its own.
    • “We see these deals as business decisions, not editorial ones,” McKenzie wrote.
  4. 2020

    订阅者电子邮件地址意外暴露

    一封政策更新电子邮件错误地使用了可见的抄送字段而不是隐藏字段,将收件人的电子邮件地址暴露给其他用户。Substack 承认了该错误。