Skip to content

S-Bank controversies

Controversies tied to this brand in public sources. A listing is not a finding of fault.

Back to profile3 entries

  1. 2019

    Anti-money-laundering compliance penalty

    The Financial Supervisory Authority imposed an administrative penalty of 980,000 euros on S-Bank for deficiencies in procedures related to preventing and investigating money laundering and terrorist financing. The deficiencies concerned the 2014–2017 period. FIM Asset Management received a public warning in the same matter, and the supplied account states that no actual money laundering was found.

  2. 2019

    S-Bank fined over customer oversight

    Fine or penalty

    Finland's Financial Supervisory Authority fined S-Bank 980,000 euros over negligence in its customer oversight and found problems with its IT systems and processes. The watchdog said it had no reason to suspect money-laundering offences had been committed in the bank's operations. S-Bank said it did not entirely agree with the authority but accepted the decision.

    Company response

    • Clarification — S-Bank

      Although we do not entirely agree with the Financial Supervisory Authority, we accept the decision.

    Source excerpt

    • The Finnish Financial Supervisory Authority (also known as FIN-FSA or Fiva) has fined S-Bank 980,000 euros over negligence in its customer oversight, also known as 'know your customer' (KYC) procedures.
    • Although we do not entirely agree with the Financial Supervisory Authority, we accept the decision.
    • However the FIN-FSA added that it "has no reason to suspect that money laundering offences referred to in the Criminal Code have been committed" in the operations of S-Bank or FIM Asset Management.
  3. 2014

    Customer-identification discrimination ruling

    The Non-Discrimination Board found that S-Bank had treated an Estonian resident discriminatorily by requiring a Finnish identity document and declining an Estonian passport for online-banking identification. The board ordered the bank to revise its instructions under a conditional penalty.