Range Resources controversies
Controversies tied to this brand in public sources. A listing is not a finding of fault.
Back to profile7 entries
2021
Pennsylvania DEP fines Range Resources $294,000
Fine or penalty
The Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection fined Range Resources $294,000 after finding that the company improperly requested inactive status for 42 wells between 2013 and 2017 and submitted inaccurate information to the state.
Company response
Remediation — Range Resources
Range has plugged all but one of the wells.
Source excerpt
The DEP found the company had improperly requested inactive status for the 42 wells between 2013 and 2017.
DEP never alleged that the wells had any impact on the environment.
2014
Pennsylvania wastewater-impoundment penalty
Range agreed to pay a $4.15 million penalty concerning alleged violations at six Marcellus drilling and hydraulic-fracturing wastewater impoundments in Washington County, including alleged soil and groundwater contamination.
2013
Oklahoma royalty underpayment settlement
Range agreed to an approximately $87.5 million settlement of claims that royalties on Oklahoma natural-gas sales had been underpaid.
2011
Pennsylvania property-damage settlement and confidentiality dispute
Range reached a $750,000 settlement with a Pennsylvania family alleging that oil and gas development damaged its farm. Later court-record litigation focused on the agreement’s confidentiality provisions and language concerning the family’s children.
2011
Pennsylvania royalty underpayment settlement
The company settled a class action alleging improper reductions in royalty payments, paying $1.75 million and agreeing to changes in its royalty program.
2010
Parker County drinking-water contamination dispute
The EPA issued an emergency order alleging that Range’s drilling contributed to methane contamination in two residential wells in Parker County, Texas. Range denied responsibility and argued that the methane originated naturally from a shallow formation. The order was withdrawn in 2012 after groundwater monitoring arrangements, while a later Inspector General report found the EPA’s actions reasonable.
2010
Brush Creek hydraulic-fracturing-fluid spill
A spill in Washington County, Pennsylvania, was associated with aquatic-life damage and resulted in a state penalty. Range attributed the event to a faulty elbow pipe and said it changed suppliers, equipment design, and procedures.