Skip to content

MICHELIN controversies

Controversies tied to this brand in public sources. A listing is not a finding of fault.

Back to profile4 entries

  1. 2021

    South Carolina jury rules in Michelin's favor in tire liability case

    Ruling

    A South Carolina jury ruled in favor of Michelin North America in a product liability case involving a 2017 motorcycle accident. The plaintiffs alleged that the tire was defectively manufactured. Michelin said the evidence showed severe under-inflation and improper maintenance, not a manufacturing defect.

    Company response

    • Denial — Michelin

      the evidence presented throughout the eight-day trial showed that the accident resulted from severe under-inflation and improper maintenance of the Michelin tire, not a manufacturing defect.

    Source excerpt

    • Plaintiffs alleged that the motorcycle tire was defectively manufactured.
    • the evidence presented throughout the eight-day trial showed that the accident resulted from severe under-inflation and improper maintenance of the Michelin tire, not a manufacturing defect.
    • A South Carolina jury has ruled unanimously in favor of Michelin North America, Inc., in a high-profile product liability case involving a 2017 motorcycle accident.
  2. 2019

    Marc Veyrat sues Michelin over restaurant demotion

    Lawsuit filed

    Chef Marc Veyrat sued Michelin, claiming that his restaurant was demoted at least in part because an inspector falsely identified cheddar in a soufflé. His case sought documents clarifying the reasons for the judgment.

    Chef Marc Veyrat is suing Michelin, claiming that his restaurant was demoted at least in part because an inspector falsely identified cheddar in a soufflé. His case seeks documents clarifying the reasons for the judgment.

    Stated objective. Clarify the exact reasons behind Michelin’s judgment.

    Company response

    • Clarification — Michelin

      We will carefully study his demands and respond calmly

    Source excerpt

    • His case requests that Michelin not only prove an inspector dined at his restaurant. More, Veyrat’s lawyer Emmanuel Ravanas is asking the court to force Michelin to hand over documents “to clarify the exact reasons” behind its judgement.
    • Veyrat is now claiming to have been dishonoured and that his restaurant was demoted — at least in part — because of what he says is a false accusation of there being English cheddar in a soufflé
    • Now, the outspoken chef is suing the French tyre company and awards body.
  3. 2005

    2005 United States Grand Prix tire crisis

    Safety concerns prevented Michelin-supplied Formula One teams from competing at Indianapolis. The incident led to strong criticism, compensation for ticket holders, and intensified disputes with the sport’s governing body.

  4. 1920

    Vietnam plantation labor conditions

    Michelin’s rubber plantations in Vietnam during the interwar period were associated with harsh labor conditions and the Phú Riềng Đỏ labor movement. The episode forms part of the company’s colonial-era labor history.