Skip to content

Merck KGaA controversies

Controversies tied to this brand in public sources. A listing is not a finding of fault.

Back to profile10 entries

  1. 2021

    Merck files Januvia patent suit against Laurus

    Lawsuit filed

    Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. filed a patent suit in the District of Delaware against Laurus Labs Limited and Laurus Generics Inc. after the defendants submitted an ANDA to the FDA seeking to produce a generic version of Januvia. Merck is seeking a declaration of patent infringement; the filing describes the alleged infringement, not a court determination.

    Source excerpt

    • Merck is seeking declaratory judgement of patent infringement after the defendants submitted an Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to produce a generic version of the plaintiff’s diabetes treatment.
    • A patent suit was filed on Thursday in the District of Delaware by Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. against Laurus Labs Limited and Laurus Generics Inc..
  2. 2021

    Gardasil injury lawsuit filed against Merck

    Lawsuit filed

    Robert F. Kennedy Jr. says he and Baum Hedlund filed a lawsuit against Merck alleging that its Gardasil HPV vaccine caused severe, life-changing injuries. The claims are allegations; the source reports no court determination.

    Source excerpt

    • This is the fifth Gardasil lawsuit Baum Hedlund and I have filed against Merck challenging the company’s dangerous and defective HPV vaccine for causing severe and life changing injuries.
  3. 2016

    United Kingdom trademark ruling involving Merck & Co.

    The High Court of Justice in the United Kingdom held that Merck & Co. had breached an agreement and infringed Merck KGaA’s rights through use of the Merck name in circumstances directed at the UK market.

  4. 2016

    Trademark dispute with the German Merck Group

    Merck & Co. and the German Merck Group continued to contest the use of the Merck name in various jurisdictions, reflecting their separate corporate histories and territorial trademark arrangements.

  5. 2009

    Sponsored medical-journal supplements

    Merck’s Australian affiliate paid Elsevier to produce medical-journal issues that presented reprinted, favorable material without clearly identifying the commercial sponsorship. The practice became public during Vioxx litigation and was acknowledged by an Elsevier executive as unacceptable.

  6. 2007

    Generics UK price and supply-fixing settlement

    Merck’s former British Generics business paid an out-of-court settlement to the UK Department of Health and Social Care concerning allegations that drug companies restricted supplies and increased prices for medicines supplied to the National Health Service.

  7. 2004

    Merck withdraws Vioxx worldwide

    Merck voluntarily removed the COX-2 painkiller Vioxx from worldwide markets after evidence linked prolonged use with increased cardiovascular risk.

  8. 2004

    Vioxx safety controversy and withdrawal

    Merck withdrew Vioxx after clinical evidence indicated increased cardiovascular risks associated with certain patterns of use. The withdrawal generated extensive personal-injury litigation and criticism concerning risk evaluation, disclosure, and marketing.

  9. 1991

    Kelco air-emissions pollution

    Merck subsidiary Kelco was linked to volatile-organic-compound emissions in the San Diego area. Merck later paid an environmental penalty and installed equipment intended to reduce emissions.

  10. 1933

    Merck’s activities during the Nazi period and wartime forced labor

    Historical accounts describe the political roles of company leader Karl Emanuel Merck during Nazi rule, the production of war-related chemicals and pharmaceuticals, and the use of forced laborers at the Darmstadt plant during the Second World War.