跳到正文

Match Group

争议事件

以下收录公开来源中与该品牌相关的争议事件。列出一条并不表示过错已经证实。

返回词条共 5 条

  1. 2026

    Brivas起诉Match Group,指控其使用FaceTec活体检测侵犯8项专利

    提起诉讼

    内华达州公司Brivas在德克萨斯州北区联邦法院对Match Group提起专利侵权诉讼,指控这家交友应用公司未经许可使用其专有的生物识别活体检测技术。涉案专利为八项与主动活体检测相关的美国专利,Brivas指控Match Group的Face Check身份验证系统(该系统将FaceTec活体检测应用于Tinder、OKCupid、BLK和Upward等应用)直接且间接侵犯每项专利。被视为非执业实体(NPE)的Brivas寻求禁令救济、损害赔偿、律师费及诉讼费用。FaceTec未被列为被告。

    当事方说明的目的. Brivas II发明人Beau Parry表示,公司执行这些专利是为了"保护我们的被许可方和该创新的价值";Brivas寻求禁令救济、损害赔偿、律师费及费用。

    品牌回应

    • 否认 — Match Group

      The FTC has misrepresented internal emails and relied on cherry-picked data to make outrageous claims and we intend to vigorously defend ourselves against these claims in court.

    来源摘录

    • The complaint examines how FaceTec’s liveness detection works, and how the technology is applied across Match Group apps including Tinder, OKCupid, BLK and Upward.
    • Brivas alleges Match Group’s Face Check identity verification system directly and indirectly violates each patent.
    • FaceTec is not named as a defendant in the lawsuit, however.
  2. 2020

    爱尔兰监管机构调查Tinder的个人数据处理

    调查

    2020年,爱尔兰数据保护委员会对Match Group旗下服务Tinder展开调查,关切点涉及用户个人数据的处理、透明度以及《通用数据保护条例》(GDPR)的合规情况。调查聚焦于个人数据如何被处理,以及是否满足GDPR规定的透明度义务。该调查是针对上述数据保护关切而启动的。

    品牌回应

    • 澄清 — Match Group

      “We are fully co-operating with the Data Protection Commission, and will continue to abide by GDPR and all applicable laws.”

    来源摘录

    • The regulator is also investigating Tinder after people in Ireland and elsewhere in the EU raised concerns about issues surrounding U.S. parent company Match Group’s “ongoing processing of users’ personal data” related to Tinder, transparency and compliance with GDPR.
  3. 2019

    联邦贸易委员会消费者行为诉讼

    联邦贸易委员会指控Match使用潜在欺诈性通信鼓励非订阅者付费,做出关于保证的误导性承诺,处理争议收费不当,并使订阅取消复杂化。Match Group否认了这些指控,并辩称监管机构依赖选择性证据。

  4. 2019

    上诉法院驳回 IAC 要求驳回 Tinder 创始人诉讼的请求

    裁决

    纽约州上诉法院驳回了 IAC 要求驳回 Tinder 创始人、高管及前员工一宗 20 亿美元诉讼的请求。原告指称相关公司低估该约会应用的估值以避免向他们支付数十亿美元;法院裁定原告可继续提出相关诉求。

    来源摘录

    • The Appellate Division in Manhattan said Tinder co-founder Sean Rad and the other five plaintiffs, who also sued IAC’s Match Group Inc unit, were not bound under their stock options agreements to what they considered artificially low valuations of their stakes.
    • A New York state appeals court on Tuesday rejected IAC/InterActiveCorp’s bid to dismiss a $2 billion lawsuit by a group of Tinder founders, executives and early employees who said it undervalued the dating app to avoid paying them billions of dollars.
  5. 2018

    Tinder估值与高管行为诉讼

    前Tinder首席执行官肖恩·拉德起诉Match Group和IAC,指控Tinder估值过低及相关股票期权索赔。争议还包括对前高管格雷格·布拉特行为的指控,公司称这些指控毫无根据。布拉特后来对拉德和另一位前Tinder人物提起诽谤诉讼。