Skip to content

Huhtamaki controversies

Controversies tied to this brand in public sources. A listing is not a finding of fault.

Back to profile1 entries

  1. 2026

    Greater Augusta Utility District sues paper companies over PFAS contamination of Augusta-area drinking-water wells

    Lawsuit filed

    The Greater Augusta Utility District, which supplies drinking water to about 13,750 residents in and around Augusta, Maine, filed a federal lawsuit against Sappi North America, Huhtamaki, Kimberly-Clark, American Tissue Mills of Maine and American Tissue Corp. The district alleges that PFAS released over decades from the companies' paper, packaging and tissue facilities entered the Kennebec River and connected groundwater, contaminating wells serving the Augusta area. It says PFAS was detected in its well water in October 2021 and rose above Maine's drinking-water standard in November 2024, and seeks joint and several liability under the federal Superfund law (CERCLA) for past and future investigation, monitoring, treatment and cleanup costs. Sappi said it is reviewing the complaint, is in compliance with all environmental regulations and does not knowingly use PFAS-containing materials; the other named companies did not respond to comment requests.

    The Greater Augusta Utility District, which serves drinking water to about 13,750 residents in and around Augusta, Maine, filed a federal lawsuit against Sappi North America, Huhtamaki, Kimberly-Clark, American Tissue Mills of Maine and American Tissue Corp., alleging that PFAS released from their paper, packaging and tissue facilities over decades entered the Kennebec River and connected groundwater and contaminated the wells serving the Augusta area. The district alleges PFAS was detected in its well water in October 2021 and rose above Maine's drinking-water standard in November 2024, and it seeks to hold the companies jointly and severally liable under the federal Superfund law (CERCLA) for past and future investigation, monitoring, treatment and cleanup costs. Sappi said it is reviewing the complaint, stating it is in compliance with all environmental regulations and does not knowingly use PFAS-containing materials; the other named companies did not respond to comment requests.

    Stated objective. Hold the named companies jointly and severally liable under the federal Superfund law (CERCLA) for past and future investigation, monitoring, treatment and cleanup costs.

    Company response

    • Denial — Sappi North America

      Sappi does not knowingly use PFAS containing materials in any of its products.
    • Investigation — Sappi North America

      the company is reviewing the complaint
    • Denial — Sappi North America

      A spokeswoman for Sappi said the company is reviewing the lawsuit. She said Sappi complies with environmental regulations, operates within its state and federal discharge permits and doesn’t knowingly use PFAS in products.

    Source excerpt

    • The district alleges PFAS-containing materials used in paper, packaging and tissue manufacturing entered the environment through wastewater, sludge, landfill leachate, stormwater and other waste streams.
    • The Greater Augusta Utility District is suing several paper and packaging companies, alleging PFAS released from their facilities over decades contaminated drinking-water wells that serve the Augusta area.
    • It alleges that results increased in November 2024 to numbers above Maine’s drinking-water standard at the time.