Skip to content

Dominion Energy controversies

Controversies tied to this brand in public sources. A listing is not a finding of fault.

Back to profile4 entries

  1. 2023

    Political influence and utility regulation criticism

    Dominion has faced sustained criticism over political contributions and lobbying in Virginia. Critics argue that its financial participation in state politics and support for legislation, including rate-adjustment mechanisms, could influence regulatory oversight and improve the company’s ability to recover costs from customers. Dominion’s political activity has included contributions to candidates and political organizations from both major parties.

  2. 2021

    Dominion Energy asks for political contribution to be returned

    Company response

    After facing backlash over its PAC funding of ads targeting Glenn Youngkin, Dominion Energy said it had asked for its contributions to the Accountability Virginia PAC to be returned.

    Company response

    • Refund or compensation — Dominion Energy

      In as much, we have asked that our contributions be returned.

    Source excerpt

    • Facing backlash, however, Dominion Energy asked for their 200 grand back, saying they "failed to vet" what the anti-Youngkin group intended to do when they donated, despite knowing who backs the PAC.
    • In as much, we have asked that our contributions be returned.
  3. 2020

    Atlantic Coast Pipeline opposition and cancellation

    The proposed Atlantic Coast Pipeline encountered lawsuits and opposition from environmental and community groups concerned about land rights, ecological impacts, and fossil-fuel dependence. Dominion and Duke Energy canceled the project after delays and rising costs.

  4. 2008

    Virginia City Hybrid Energy Center environmental controversy

    Environmental groups criticized Dominion’s Wise County coal-fired power project over projected carbon dioxide and mercury emissions, coal and biomass fuel use, ash disposal near the Clinch River, and its relationship to mountaintop-removal mining. Activists blockaded the project site in 2008, while supporters emphasized jobs, tax revenue, and reduced dependence on imported electricity.