Claude controversies
Controversies tied to this brand in public sources. A listing is not a finding of fault.
Back to profile6 entries
2026
Claude Cowork file-deletion incident
An early Cowork user reported that the agent deleted family photographs while attempting to organize files on a computer. The files were restored from an iCloud backup, but the report highlighted the risks of granting broad filesystem access to an AI agent.
2026
Anthropic–U.S. Department of War dispute
Anthropic refused to remove contractual prohibitions on mass domestic surveillance and fully autonomous weapons. The Department of War subsequently designated Anthropic a supply-chain risk, while Anthropic challenged the designation and argued that it exceeded the government’s legal authority.
2026
Anthropic discloses bio-block classifier gap in contractor feedback traffic
Issue disclosure
Anthropic disclosed in its 186-page risk report that from May 2025 to April 2026, human feedback data collection traffic used by contractors for model evaluation did not run the biological blocking classifier, covering roughly 50,000 people and 133 million interactions. Anthropic said a rescan found no significant biological misuse but acknowledged the gap raises the possibility that other similar problems remain undiscovered.
Company response
Ongoing disclosure — Anthropic
Anthropic 后来重新扫描相关流量,没有发现显著能够给威胁行为者带来有意义能力提升的生物滥用。但它在报告中承认:这个漏洞本身,提高了一种可能性——“可能还有其他类似问题尚未被发现”。
Source excerpt
Anthropic 后来重新扫描相关流量,没有发现显著能够给威胁行为者带来有意义能力提升的生物滥用。但它在报告中承认:这个漏洞本身,提高了一种可能性——“可能还有其他类似问题尚未被发现”。
从 2025 年 5 月,也就是 Anthropic 第一次部署带有化学和生物安全保障的模型开始,到 2026 年 4 月,所有承包商用于模型评估的人类反馈数据采集流量,都没有运行生物阻断分类器。这一访问池大约涉及 5 万人、1.33 亿次交互。
2025
Claude Code used in cyber-espionage activity
Anthropic reported that a threat actor used Claude Code to automate a substantial portion of cyber-espionage operations against multiple organizations. Anthropic banned associated accounts and notified law enforcement and affected organizations.
2025
Public Claude chat links become searchable
Some Claude conversations shared through public links were reportedly discoverable through search engines. The incident raised concerns about users misunderstanding the privacy implications of public sharing and about the interaction between crawler rules and no-index directives.
2024
Crawler traffic and scraping criticism from iFixit
iFixit criticized Anthropic’s web crawler for accessing its site at a very high frequency and creating excessive load while collecting content. The episode contributed to broader concerns about generative-AI companies’ web-crawling practices and respect for publisher controls.