跳到正文

波士顿科学

争议事件

以下收录公开来源中与该品牌相关的争议事件。列出一条并不表示过错已经证实。

返回词条共 4 条

  1. 2026

    波士顿科学披露网络攻击导致全球运营中断

    问题披露

    波士顿科学周三表示,一次影响其部分信息技术系统的网络攻击已造成全球性中断,并限制了对其运营所依赖的某些信息系统和业务应用的访问,包括处理和发运客户订单的能力。公司称尚不清楚此次入侵的全部范围和性质及其运营和财务影响,正与网络安全专家合作评估和遏制威胁并恢复受影响系统,但尚无全面恢复的时间表。

    品牌回应

    • 调查 — Boston Scientific

      Boston Scientific said it is working with cybersecurity experts to assess and contain the threat and to restore affected functions and systems access, but that it doesn't yet have a timeline for a full restoration.

    来源摘录

    • Boston Scientific on Wednesday said the hack, which is affecting some of its information-technology systems, has caused global disruptions and limitations of access to certain information systems and business applications that support aspects of its operations, including its ability to process and ship customer orders.
    • Boston Scientific said it is working with cybersecurity experts to assess and contain the threat and to restore affected functions and systems access, but that it doesn't yet have a timeline for a full restoration.
    • Boston Scientific has been hit with a cyberattack that is hampering the medical-technology company's ability to fill orders.
  2. 2026

    FDA将波士顿科学ENROUTE设备召回列为I类

    宣布召回

    在收到使用中动脉鞘尖端分离的报告后,FDA将某些波士顿科学ENROUTE经颈动脉神经保护系统和ENROUTE NPS Plus设备的召回列为最严重的I类。波士顿科学已于2026年7月9日向受影响客户发送了初始信函。

    品牌回应

    • 召回 — Boston Scientific

      Boston Scientific sent the initial letter to affected customers on July 9, 2026

    来源摘录

    • The FDA had classified a recall of certain ENROUTE Transcarotid Neuroprotection System and ENROUTE NPS Plus devices as the most serious type of recall — Class I — following reports of arterial sheath tip separation during use.
    • Boston Scientific sent the initial letter to affected customers on July 9, 2026
  3. 2021

    陪审团认定Nevro侵犯Boston Scientific两项专利

    裁决

    特拉华州陪审团认定Nevro侵犯Boston Scientific的两项专利,并判给Boston Scientific 2,000万美元。Nevro表示不同意该认定并计划提起上诉。

    品牌回应

    • 否认 — Nevro

      We disagree with the finding by the jury and plan to appeal

    来源摘录

    • We disagree with the finding by the jury and plan to appeal
    • today announced that a Delaware jury found that Nevro infringed two Boston Scientific patents (7,891,085 and 8,019,439) directed to ways of manufacturing spinal cord stimulation (SCS) leads, which Nevro obtains from a third-party supplier. Two other Boston Scientific lead patents (8,646,172 and 8,650,747) were not infringed. The jury awarded Boston Scientific $20 million.
  4. 2010

    不当医生付款执法行动

    美国司法部对波士顿科学处以60万美元罚款,原因是该公司向一名陆军医生支付费用,要求其使用其设备并向其他医生推荐。该事件涉及不当诱导,并引发了对医疗器械公司与临床医生之间互动的合规担忧。