跳到正文

密歇根蓝十字蓝盾

争议事件

以下收录公开来源中与该品牌相关的争议事件。列出一条并不表示过错已经证实。

返回词条共 2 条

  1. 2026

    密歇根州就涉嫌非法保险垄断起诉密歇根蓝十字蓝盾

    提起诉讼

    密歇根州总检察长达娜·内塞尔代表州政府起诉密歇根蓝十字蓝盾,指控该保险公司通过与其它蓝十字蓝盾实体达成非法反竞争协议获得非法垄断地位。起诉书指控该公司利用市场支配力抬高保费和自付费用,同时将其支付给医疗服务提供者的费率压至全美最低水平,并称蓝十字控制了该州65%的健康保险市场和79%的PPO市场。

    当事方说明的目的. 迈出重要一步,终结蓝十字阴谋及其非法垄断

    品牌回应

    • 否认 — Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan

      We fundamentally disagree with the Attorney General's characterization of an uncompetitive insurance market in Michigan," the company said.
    • 否认 — Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan

      BCBSM responded to the lawsuit with a statement, saying: "We were blindsided by this announcement by the Attorney General. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan has not yet been served and therefore we cannot comment on the specific merits of the case. We fundamentally disagree with the Attorney General’s characterization of an uncompetitive insurance market in Michigan.
    • 否认 — Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan

      Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan has not yet been served and therefore we cannot comment on the specific merits of the case. We fundamentally disagree with the Attorney General’s characterization of an uncompetitive insurance market in Michigan.

    来源摘录

    • Today we’re taking a significant step toward ending the Blue Conspiracy and their illegal monopoly
    • The company did that, the attorney general argues, through striking illegal and anti-competitive agreements with other Blue Cross Blue Shield entities.
    • The state of Michigan sued Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan, alleging the insurer has obtained an illegal monopoly that has led to higher health care costs and worse health outcomes.
  2. 2019

    关于药物滥用治疗付款和索赔拒绝的争议

    四家密歇根成瘾治疗机构起诉BCBSM,指控该保险公司不合理地减少付款并拒绝大量药物滥用治疗索赔。现有参考资料未确定最终法律结果。