Bank of Qingdao controversies
Controversies tied to this brand in public sources. A listing is not a finding of fault.
Back to profile7 entries
2026
Fined 203,300 yuan by the central bank for violating financial statistics rules
In July 2026, the Qingdao branch of the People's Bank of China publicly announced that Bank of Qingdao had violated financial statistics management regulations and imposed a fine of 203,300 yuan on the bank.
2026
Penalty of RMB 1.161 million for six violations involving accounts, credit reporting, and customer due diligence
In February 2026, Bank of Qingdao was fined RMB 1.161 million by the central bank for six violations, including financial statistics, account management, anti-counterfeit currency, credit information, suspicious transaction reporting, and customer due diligence. This penalty is separate from the statistics-related fine issued in July.
2026
Fined 500,000 yuan by financial regulators for improperly disposing of non-performing assets
In June 2026, the head office of Bank of Qingdao was fined 500,000 yuan for improperly disposing of non-performing assets, and the person then in charge of credit management was given a warning and fined 50,000 yuan.
2026
Dongying branch fined 800,000 yuan for inadequate case prevention and concealing risk information
In January 2026, the Dongying branch of Bank of Qingdao was fined 800,000 yuan for inadequate case prevention management and for concealing case and case risk information. The entry clearly assigns responsibility to the branch.
2026
Jinan Branch Fined RMB 650,000 for Inadequate Supervision of Bill Margins and Loan Use
In January 2026, the Jinan Branch of Bank of Qingdao was fined RMB 650,000 for failing to diligently manage acceptance bill margins and for failing to inspect and supervise the use of working capital loans.
2022
Three Sub-branches Fined a Total of RMB 1.6 Million for Real Estate Credit Violations
In 2022, the Shibei, Laixi, and Gangkou sub-branches of Bank of Qingdao were fined RMB 400,000, RMB 400,000, and RMB 800,000 respectively for violating real estate credit policies, diverting loans into home purchases and wealth management products, and fraudulent mortgage transactions. This entry consolidates the sub-branch penalties listed in the same report.
2020
Investors sue Qingdao Bank over China Railway-affiliated private funds
Lawsuit filed
Investors sued Qingdao Bank after alleging that certain China Railway-affiliated private-fund products they had signed for listed the bank as custodian and bore its official seal. The source also states that the products shown on the AMAC website had no custodian and that Qingdao Bank lacked fund-custodian qualifications. The report presents these claims as the basis of the dispute without detailing the litigation's outcome.
Source excerpt
据界面新闻此前报道,有投资者爆料称,其在所签的中铁系私募产品中发现,有部分产品的托管人为青岛银行,并还盖有青岛银行公章。
或是因为此前其卷入“中铁系”私募事件,投资者将青岛银行诉诸法庭。
值得注意的是,中基协官网信息显示,中铁中基系爆雷的11只产品均无托管机构,并且青岛银行也没有基金托管人的资格。