Skip to content

AtkinsRéalis controversies

Controversies tied to this brand in public sources. A listing is not a finding of fault.

Back to profile7 entries

  1. 2022

    Deferred prosecution agreement over bridge case

    SNC-Lavalin entered a deferred prosecution agreement concerning the Jacques-Cartier Bridge matter and agreed to pay fines, surcharges and victim compensation totaling CA$29.6 million, according to the referenced material.

  2. 2019

    SNC-Lavalin Construction sentenced for fraud in Libya operations

    Fine or penalty

    SNC-Lavalin Construction Inc. pleaded guilty to fraud against Libyan authorities and was sentenced to pay a $280 million fine over five years and serve three years of probation. The court record described payments benefiting Saadi Ghadafi.

    Company response

    • Denial — SNC-Lavalin

      SNC-Lavalin said in a statement Thursday that it intends to plead not guilty to the charges when the matters come to court.

    Source excerpt

    • Through a joint recommendation, SNC-Lavalin Construction Inc. was sentenced to pay a $280-million fine over a five-year period and to three years of probation.
    • During a hearing before Quebec Court Judge Claude Leblanc, the company, represented by lawyer François Fontaine, pleaded guilty to committing fraud “against various Libyan authorities.”
    • “Bribes were paid from these accounts to a foreign public official and commissions were paid to various entities and individuals, including to Mr. Riadh Ben Aissa and to Mr. Sami Bebawi. In total, bribes of $50,276,761 were paid to the benefit of Saadi Ghadafi in the form of cash, a yacht, renovations to a condominium as well as extravagant travel and hospitality.”
  3. 2017

    Jacques-Cartier Bridge bribery case

    Former Federal Bridge Corporation chief executive Michel Fournier pleaded guilty to accepting bribes connected with the Jacques-Cartier Bridge repair contract. Canadian authorities later charged two SNC-Lavalin subsidiaries and two former executives in a related investigation.

  4. 2015

    SNC-Lavalin charged over alleged Libya dealings

    Lawsuit filed

    The RCMP charged SNC-Lavalin and two subsidiaries with fraud and corruption over alleged dealings in Libya between 2001 and 2011. SNC-Lavalin denied the charges and said it would vigorously defend itself.

    Company response

    • Denial — SNC-Lavalin

      SNC-Lavalin denied the charges and in a statement said it will "vigorously defend itself."
    • Denial — SNC-Lavalin

      SNC-Lavalin denies the charges and says it will vigorously defend itself.
    • Denial — SNC-Lavalin

      SNC-Lavalin responded to Thursday's police announcement by saying the charges laid against the businesses are without merit, and not guilty pleas will be entered in the interest of its employees, clients, investors and stakeholders.

    Source excerpt

    • SNC-Lavalin denied the charges and in a statement said it will "vigorously defend itself."
    • The company also allegedly defrauded Libyan officials of $129.8 million between the same dates.
    • SNC-Lavalin Group Inc., SNC-Lavalin International Inc. and SNC-Lavalin Construction Inc. are each accused of bribing one or more Libyan government officials with $47.7 million or more, between 2001 and 2011.
  5. 2004

    Political-donation reimbursement investigation

    Canadian authorities investigated allegations that SNC-Lavalin reimbursed employee political donations, a practice prohibited under Canadian electoral law. The referenced material describes an agreement with Elections Canada that avoided prosecution.

  6. 2001

    Libya-related bribery allegations

    Company management and historical contracts were investigated under Canada's Corruption of Foreign Public Officials Act in connection with allegations of bribing Libyan officials between 2001 and 2011.

  7. 1995

    Kerala hydroelectric contract allegations

    SNC-Lavalin's contract to modernize hydroelectric stations in Kerala, India, later became the subject of allegations concerning bribery and financial irregularities. An Indian investigation led to the expulsion of several officials; the referenced material states that no charges were brought against the firm.