阿斯利康的争议事件
以下收录公开来源中与该品牌相关的争议事件。列出一条并不表示过错已经证实。
返回词条共 12 条
2026
阿斯利康因发现中心缺陷起诉国际消防顾问公司索赔3200万英镑
提起诉讼
阿斯利康已向高等法院提起诉讼,向消防顾问公司International Fire Consultants(IFC)索赔3200万英镑,指控IFC未履行其职责,导致其剑桥发现中心建设出现广泛缺陷。阿斯利康称2021年至2023年间的修复工作花费超过3170万英镑。IFC已提交抗辩,称该索赔错误且不正确,阿斯利康已提交法院回复予以驳回。
来源摘录
IFC has filed a defence against the allegations. Their filing calls AstraZeneca’s claim “misconceived and incorrect”.
The pharmaceutical giant has accused International Fire Consultants (IFC) of causing “widespread defects” in the construction of its Cambridge-based facility,
AstraZeneca stated that, between 2021 and 2023, the remediation work they carried out to address the defects cost them over £31.7 million.
2021
阿斯利康回应欧盟法律行动
公司回应
2021年4月,阿斯利康就欧盟采取的法律行动作出回应。该公司表示对欧盟的法律行动感到遗憾,认为诉讼没有法律依据,并称将在法庭上为自己申辩。新浪财经于2021年4月27日报道了这一回应。
品牌回应
否认 — 阿斯利康
我们相信(欧盟的)任何诉讼都没有法律依据
来源摘录
我们相信(欧盟的)任何诉讼都没有法律依据
阿斯利康发表声明回应,称对欧盟这项行动表示遗憾,将在法庭申辩。
2021
欧盟因疫苗交付问题对阿斯利康启动法律程序
提起诉讼
欧盟对阿斯利康启动法律程序,指称该公司未遵守疫苗供应合同条款,也没有确保按时交付的可靠方案。阿斯利康表示已完全遵守协议,并将出庭为自己辩护。
品牌回应
否认 — AstraZeneca
AstraZeneca shortly struck back, claiming it had fully complied with the advance purchase deal with the European Commission, and adding it was set to strongly defend itself in court.
来源摘录
AstraZeneca shortly struck back, claiming it had fully complied with the advance purchase deal with the European Commission, and adding it was set to strongly defend itself in court.
The European Union has kicked off legal proceedings against the Swedish-British pharmaceutical company AstraZeneca citing its failure to deliver on an agreed upon contract to deliver vaccines to EU countries, the European Commission said in a statement.
Wednesday, 5 May 2021, 4:40 pm
2021
阿斯利康就替格瑞洛专利起诉 Alembic
提起诉讼
阿斯利康起诉 Alembic Pharmaceuticals,指称 Alembic 的替格瑞洛仿制药将侵犯其专利。报道描述了阿斯利康就该仿制药提出的指控,未说明法院已对此作出裁定。来源未提供有关当事方、专利或诉讼结果的更多细节。
来源摘录
The plaintiff stated that contrary to the claims made in the notice letter, the defendant’s generic version of the drug does directly infringe upon claims within its patent and its relation to their brand name drug BRILINTA.
On Friday, pharmaceutical company AstraZeneca filed a lawsuit against Alembic Pharmaceuticals for allegedly infringing on their drug patent.
2021
PUMA Biotechnology和Wyeth就Tagrisso专利起诉AstraZeneca
提起诉讼
PUMA Biotechnology Inc.和Wyeth LLC在特拉华州起诉AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals,指称AstraZeneca的Tagrisso侵犯其专利。该指称属于诉讼主张,并非法院裁定。
来源摘录
The plaintiffs alleged that AstraZeneca’s Tagrisso drug, even though it was approved by the Food and Drug Administration, infringes on their patent.
On Wednesday a case was filed in the District Court of Delaware. The case was filed by PUMA Biotechnology Inc and Wyeth LLC against AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals.
2021
《每日快报》更正有关阿斯利康疫苗配方的虚假说法
公司回应
《每日快报》更正了一篇错误声称俄罗斯复制阿斯利康疫苗配方制造本国疫苗的文章。该报致歉,并刊载俄罗斯直接投资基金的回应。该说法涉及阿斯利康,但来源并未证实配方遭窃。
当事方说明的目的. 澄清事实。
品牌回应
道歉 — Daily Express
The British tabloid apologised for the publication of the false theft claim
澄清 — Daily Express
The Daily Express, a British tabloid, issued a correction to an 11 October article, which falsely claimed that "Russia [...] copied the formula of the AstraZeneca jab and used it to help make its own vaccine".
来源摘录
The Daily Express, a British tabloid, issued a correction to an 11 October article, which falsely claimed that "Russia [...] copied the formula of the AstraZeneca jab and used it to help make its own vaccine".
The British tabloid apologised for the publication of the false theft claim and sought to "set the record straight" by publishing the official response of the Russian Direct Investment Fund (RDIF), which funded the Sputnik V development.
2021
AstraZeneca就Zejula许可协议起诉Glaxo
提起诉讼
AstraZeneca在英国起诉GlaxoSmithKline,指称双方关于抗癌药Zejula的2012年许可协议遭到违反,并要求获得更大的销售份额。
来源摘录
AstraZeneca (, AZN) filed a lawsuit in the U.K. against GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), saying a 2012 licensing agreement over the Zejula cancer drug was breached and, therefore, it should have a greater share of sales
2021
英国监管机构报告接种阿斯利康疫苗后出现血栓病例
危害披露
英国监管机构表示,在使用阿斯利康新冠疫苗后发现了30例罕见血栓事件。
来源摘录
British regulators on Thursday said they have identified 30 cases of rare blood clot events after the use of the AstraZeneca Covid-19 vaccine, 25 more than the agency previously reported.
2021
欧洲药品管理局调查阿斯利康新冠疫苗相关血栓报告
调查
欧洲药品管理局药物警戒风险评估委员会正在调查接种阿斯利康新冠疫苗者出现的血栓栓塞事件。该机构表示调查仍在进行,并认为疫苗目前的获益仍大于风险。
当事方说明的目的. 确定疫苗是否可能与报告的事件有关,或这些事件是否可能由其他原因导致。
来源摘录
The Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee (PRAC) of the European Medicines Agency (EMA) is investigating cases of thromboembolic events related to AstraZeneca's COVID-19 vaccine, but says the benefits currently still outweigh risks.
Experts are looking in great detail at all the available data and clinical circumstances surrounding specific cases to determine whether the vaccine might have contributed or if the event is likely to have been due to other causes.
2020
阿斯利康在安全性担忧背景下公布疫苗试验方案
问题披露
阿斯利康在要求提高透明度的压力下公布了新冠疫苗试验详情。报道指出,两名试验参与者出现严重神经系统疾病,曾导致试验暂停;公司称这些疾病不太可能与疫苗有关,或现有证据不足以确定是否相关。
来源摘录
A participant information sheet dated Sept. 11 on AstraZeneca’s trial in Britain lumped the two volunteers’ cases together, stating the illnesses were “unlikely to be associated with the vaccine or there was insufficient evidence to say for certain that the illnesses were or were not related to the vaccine,” based on safety reviews.
AstraZeneca revealed details of its large coronavirus vaccine trials Saturday, the third in a wave of rare disclosures by drug companies under pressure to be more transparent about how they are testing products that are the world’s best hope for ending the pandemic.
2020
阿斯利康因美国疫苗试验透明度受到批评
公众反弹
2020年11月,阿斯利康因其新冠疫苗美国临床试验的透明度问题受到批评。报道称,外界要求阿斯利康和美国食品药品监督管理局解释该美国临床试验仍处于暂停状态的原因。批评者表示需要更高的透明度。报道称,公司尚未解释试验为何未恢复。
来源摘录
Despite these calls, both the FDA and AstraZeneca have yet to explain why the trial hasn't resumed.
both the FDA and AstraZeneca should be more open about why the trial for the coronavirus vaccine remains on pause
2020
Covishield试验志愿者因声称出现不良反应起诉血清研究所
提起诉讼
一名40岁的Covishield试验志愿者起诉印度血清研究所,索赔5亿卢比,并声称疫苗导致包括神经功能障碍在内的不良反应。据报道,医院机构伦理委员会认定该不良反应并非由试验疫苗造成。该事件涉及一名试验参与者的法律索赔以及据报道的伦理委员会结论;来源未提供有关案件结果的更多细节。
来源摘录
A 40-year-old volunteer for 'Covishield', the candidate vaccine being tested by the Pune-based Serum Institute of India (SII), has sued the company for ₹5 crore, alleging that the vaccine triggered an adverse reaction, which includes neurological impairment and an inability to get back to the life before being inoculated.
The hospital's institutional ethics committee had given a letter, Dr. Ramakrishnan said, that said the adverse reaction was not due to the study vaccine, and this was also communicated to the Drug Controller General of India (DGCI), the apex regulator.