The Big Five was the name given to a group of what started as sugarcane processing corporations that wielded considerable political power in the Territory of Hawaii during the early 20th century, and leaned heavily toward the Hawaii Republican Party. The Big Five were Castle & Cooke, Alexander & Baldwin, C. Brewer & Co., Theo H. Davies & Co., and American Factors (now Amfac).[1] The term "Big Five" is often used in both association to the largest five corporations and the five missionary families from which these companies hailed. These missionary families were the first generation of missionaries to settle in Hawaii. While not all of the Big Five corporations were started by missionary families, by 1920, the second generation of missionary descendants controlled all five companies.[2] The extent of the power that the Big Five had was considered by some as equivalent to an oligarchy. Attorney General of Hawaii Edmund Pearson Dole, referring to the Big Five, said in 1903: "There is a government in this Territory which is centralized to an extent unknown in the United States, and probably almost as centralized as it was in France under Louis XIV."[3]
History
19th Century
Though commercial sugar production began in the first years of the 1800s, the industry remained relatively minor until the Reciprocity Treaty of 1875. This treaty provided duty-free trade of sugar between the Kingdom of Hawaii and the United States, and it generated massive disruptions in the sugar industry. Plantation growth and consolidation soon followed, with the number of plantations falling from 79 in 1875 to just 20 in 1883.[4] Prior to this disruption, the agencies played a much more limited role in Hawaiian industry. They served primarily to add liquidity to an agricultural industry with long growing periods (18–24 months) by both providing credit against future sales and providing transportation to foreign markets and equipment procurement. With the growth pressure imposed by the Reciprocity Treaty, however, plantations required capital infusions in order to expand their cultivation into more marginal lands, leading to increased reliance on the agencies for credit.[4] In 1889, C. Brewer & Co., H. Hackfeld & Co. (Amfac), Castle & Cooke, and Theo. H. Davies & Co., which were the original four predecessors of the Big Five, controlled 56% of sugar crops in Hawaii.[2] The political stance of the five firms varied from pro-monarchy to revolutionary.
References
- Lyn Danninger. Isle institutions' economic impact endures Honolulu Star-Bulletin, September 29, 2002, retrieved 2010-05-01^
- Carol A. Maclennan. Sovereign Sugar: Industry and Environment in Hawaii University of Hawaii Press, March 31, 2014^
- Maenette Kapeʻahiokalani Padeken Ah Nee-Benham. Culture and educational policy in Hawaiʻi: the silencing of native voices Psychology Press, 1998^