OFILM controversies
Controversies tied to this brand in public sources. A listing is not a finding of fault.
Back to profile1 entries
2026
O-Film denies allegations of asset tunneling via related-party transactions
Company response
In a clarification announcement issued on the evening of August 9, 2026, O-Film (002456.SZ) denied allegations made by media and investors that actual controller Cai Rongjun tunneled assets out of the listed company through New Feiguang and New Sikao. The company stated that the three entities operate independently, that related-party transactions are priced fairly and disclosed in compliance with applicable rules, and that it has sent retraction letters to the media outlets involved and reported the matter to public security authorities.
O-Film (002456.SZ) issued a clarification announcement on the evening of August 9, 2026, denying media and investor allegations that actual controller Cai Rongjun tunneled assets out of the listed company through New Feiguang and New Sikao. The company said the three entities operate independently, related-party transactions are priced fairly and disclosed in compliance, and that it sent retraction letters to media and reported the matter to public security authorities.
Company response
Denial — 欧菲光
欧菲光逐一否认市场关于该公司实际控制人蔡荣军通过其控制的另外两家公司——新菲光通信技术有限公司（以下简称“新菲光”）、新思考电机股份有限公司（以下简称“新思考”），实施利益输送的相关传闻。
Clarification — 欧菲光
8月9日晚，欧菲光（002456.SZ）发布澄清公告，针对近期市场集中发酵的媒体舆情作出全面回应。
Investigation — 欧菲光
经公司全面内部核查，相关媒体报道内容严重不实
Source excerpt
8月9日晚，欧菲光（002456.SZ）发布澄清公告，针对近期市场集中发酵的媒体舆情作出全面回应。
公司已正式向相关媒体发送撤稿函，并针对不实信息传播向公安机关报案追责。
有媒体称收到投资者实名举报内容，质疑蔡荣军掏空上市公司资产