Skip to content
WorldBrand.AI

Kangbah

Controversies

Controversies tied to this brand in public sources. A listing is not a finding of fault.

Back to profile3 entries

  1. 2021

    Court orders Kangbach to pay Supor RMB 3 million

    Ruling

    A first-instance judgment in a commercial-disparagement case brought by Supor ordered Kangbach to pay RMB 3 million and to eliminate the impact through the original channels, according to a news report. The court stated that, at the time Kangbach published its allegations, no judicial ruling or administrative decision had established that Supor infringed Kangbach's patent rights. The report describes the ruling as a first-instance decision in the case.

    The article reports that a first-instance judgment in Supor's commercial-disparagement case ordered Kangbach to pay RMB 3 million and eliminate the impact through the original channels. The court said no judicial ruling or administrative decision had established Supor's patent infringement when Kangbach published its allegations.

    Source excerpt

    • 就在近日，事情的发展走向让不少人大跌眼镜——康巴赫起诉苏泊尔一案被法院驳回后，苏泊尔起诉康巴赫商业诋毁案做出了一审判决，康巴赫被判赔300万元，并按原路径消除影响。
    • 问题关键在于，巴赫公司发布上诉信息时，并无任何司法裁判或行政决定认定苏泊尔公司构成对巴赫公司专利权的侵害。
    Source

  2. 2019

    Kangbach sues Supor over honeycomb non-stick patent

    Lawsuit filed

    Kangbach alleged that Supor’s honeycomb-series frying pans used its honeycomb non-stick patent technology and constituted serious infringement; the article reports a lawsuit over the dispute.

    Source excerpt

    • 为此，康巴赫方面认为，苏泊尔蜂窝系列炒锅涉嫌严重侵权使用康巴赫蜂窝不粘锅的专利技术。
    • 近日，德国锅具品牌康巴赫对苏泊尔提起诉讼，起诉苏泊尔侵害其发明专利。
    • 目前该事件尚未解决，还待后续发展。
    Source

  3. 2017

    “German Brand” Fake Foreign Goods Promotion Penalized Twice; Consumers Complain Coating Peels Off

    Kangbach is actually an enterprise in Wuyi, Zhejiang, and long promoted itself as a “German brand” and “from Germany.” In 2017 it was fined by the Wuyi County Market Supervision Administration and ordered to eliminate the impact; in 2019 it was penalized again because it could not prove the authenticity of its promotion, becoming embroiled in a “fake foreign goods” controversy. In 2022 consumers complained that its cookware’s coating peeled off after half a month of use and that it stuck severely, questioning the livestream claim of “coating-free” as suspected false advertising. Administrative penalty; brand reputation damaged.

    Source