Skip to content

Tai Er Suan Cai Yu

Controversies

Controversies tied to this brand in public sources. A listing is not a finding of fault.

Back to profile2 entries

  1. 2025

    Freshly Killed Fish Claim Questioned as Stores' Actual Supply Practices Draw Scrutiny

    In September 2025, questions arose over whether some Tai Er outlets were actually killing fish fresh on site. Parent company Jiumaojiu responded that the upgrade of outlets to the fresh-kill model was being rolled out gradually, with 68 such stores at the time, and that it planned to complete the conversion of all stores. This entry distinguishes upgraded outlets from existing ones and documents the dispute over how the claim was communicated to customers.

  2. 2021

    Court rules in Tai Er trademark infringement case

    Ruling

    In a ruling issued on April 25, the Tianhe District Court found that the Tai Qi Suancaiyu restaurant had infringed the trademark rights of Tai Er Suancaiyu and had engaged in unfair competition. The court ordered Tai Qi Suancaiyu to stop the infringement and to pay Tai Er Suancaiyu RMB 300,000 in damages. The decision addressed both the trademark infringement claim and the unfair competition claim brought by Tai Er Suancaiyu.

    On April 25, the Tianhe District Court ruled that the Tai Qi Suancaiyu restaurant infringed the trademark rights of Tai Er Suancaiyu and engaged in unfair competition. The court ordered it to stop the infringement and pay Tai Er Suancaiyu RMB 300,000 in damages.

    Source excerpt

    • 公开信息显示,天河区法院在4月25日一审判定 “太七酸菜鱼”构成侵犯商标权及不正当竞争,判决立即停止侵权,赔偿“太二酸菜鱼”30万元损失。